These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18774694)

  • 1. Biomechanical comparison of four different miniscrew types for skeletal anchorage in the mandibulo-maxillary area.
    Mischkowski RA; Kneuertz P; Florvaag B; Lazar F; Koebke J; Zöller JE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 37(10):948-54. PubMed ID: 18774694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pedicle screw fixation strength: pullout versus insertional torque.
    Inceoglu S; Ferrara L; McLain RF
    Spine J; 2004; 4(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 15363421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical properties of orthodontic miniscrews. An in-vitro study.
    Florvaag B; Kneuertz P; Lazar F; Koebke J; Zöller JE; Braumann B; Mischkowski RA
    J Orofac Orthop; 2010 Jan; 71(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 20135250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanical testing of small fracture implants for comparison of insertion and failure torques.
    Glauser CR; Oden ZM; Ambrose CG; Willits MB; Coupe KJ
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Oct; 123(8):388-91. PubMed ID: 14574594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture resistance of orthodontic mini-implants: a biomechanical in vitro study.
    Wilmes B; Panayotidis A; Drescher D
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):396-401. PubMed ID: 21310766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlation of bone equivalent mineral density to pull-out resistance of triangulated pedicle screw construct.
    Hadjipavlou AG; Nicodemus CL; al-Hamdan FA; Simmons JW; Pope MH
    J Spinal Disord; 1997 Feb; 10(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 9041491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical comparison of anatomic trajectory pedicle screw versus injectable calcium sulfate graft-augmented pedicle screw for salvage in cadaveric thoracic bone.
    Derincek A; Wu C; Mehbod A; Transfeldt EE
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Jun; 19(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 16778665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical and histomorphometric study on the bone-screw interface of bioactive ceramic-coated titanium screws.
    Lee JH; Ryu HS; Lee DS; Hong KS; Chang BS; Lee CK
    Biomaterials; 2005 Jun; 26(16):3249-57. PubMed ID: 15603820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bicortical vs monocortical orthodontic skeletal anchorage.
    Brettin BT; Grosland NM; Qian F; Southard KA; Stuntz TD; Morgan TA; Marshall SD; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):625-35. PubMed ID: 18984394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between uniaxial pull-out tests and torque measurement of 2.0-mm self-tapping screws.
    Boyle JM; Frost DE; Foley WL; Grady JJ
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 8228429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stress relaxation of bone significantly affects the pull-out behavior of pedicle screws.
    Inceoglu S; McLain RF; Cayli S; Kilincer C; Ferrara L
    J Orthop Res; 2004 Nov; 22(6):1243-7. PubMed ID: 15475204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pedicle screw surface coatings improve fixation in nonfusion spinal constructs.
    Upasani VV; Farnsworth CL; Tomlinson T; Chambers RC; Tsutsui S; Slivka MA; Mahar AT; Newton PO
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(4):335-43. PubMed ID: 19182704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical comparison of a novel multilevel hex-head pedicle screw design with a conventional head design.
    Liu Q; Olson DR; Tiley FW; Shea M; Smits M; Hart RA
    J Orthop Res; 2007 Aug; 25(8):1115-20. PubMed ID: 17444509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of the osseous/metal interface of drill free screws and self-tapping screws.
    Heidemann W; Terheyden H; Gerlach KL
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2001 Apr; 29(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 11465436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screw pull-out force is dependent on screw orientation in an anterior cervical plate construct.
    DiPaola CP; Jacobson JA; Awad H; Conrad BP; Rechtine GR
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Jul; 20(5):369-73. PubMed ID: 17607102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preloads generated with repeated tightening in three types of screws used in dental implant assemblies.
    Byrne D; Jacobs S; O'Connell B; Houston F; Claffey N
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 16681498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
    Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical characterisation of osteosyntheses for proximal femur fractures: helical blade versus screw.
    Al-Munajjed AA; Hammer J; Mayr E; Nerlich M; Lenich A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():1-10. PubMed ID: 18376008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.
    Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro comparison of 1.5 mm vs. 2.0 mm screws for fixation in the sagittal split osteotomy.
    Scaf de Molon R; de Ávila ÉD; Scartezini GR; Bonini Campos JA; Vaz LG; Real Gabrielli MF; Pereira Filho VA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 39(8):574-7. PubMed ID: 21227709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.