These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1877554)

  • 21. A growth-related concept for skeletal class II treatment.
    Teuscher U
    Am J Orthod; 1978 Sep; 74(3):258-75. PubMed ID: 281130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Two-phase treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion with the combination of the twin-block appliance and high-pull headgear.
    Lv Y; Yan B; Wang L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):246-55. PubMed ID: 22858335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
    Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Results of a comparative study of skeletal anomaly Class II cases after activator, headgear and combined headgear-activator treatment].
    Papadopoulos MA; Rakosi T
    Hell Stomatol Chron; 1990; 34(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 2130044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cephalometric changes during headgear-reactivator treatment.
    Remmelink HJ; Tan BG
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Dec; 13(6):466-70. PubMed ID: 1817072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Vertical control in fully-banded orthodontic treatment.
    Pearson LE
    Angle Orthod; 1986 Jul; 56(3):205-24. PubMed ID: 3461731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Benefit of early Class II treatment: progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial.
    Tulloch JF; Phillips C; Proffit WR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jan; 113(1):62-72, quiz 73-4. PubMed ID: 9457020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of arch dimension changes in 1-phase vs 2-phase treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    Wortham JR; Dolce C; McGorray SP; Le H; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 19577150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dental and orthopedic effects of high-pull headgear in treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion.
    Firouz M; Zernik J; Nanda R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Sep; 102(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 1510043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Intensive treatment in severe distal bite using the headgear-Herbst appliance in mixed dentition].
    Wieslander L
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed (1984); 1984 Nov; 94(11):1189-206. PubMed ID: 6595787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of Class II activator and Class II activator high-pull headgear combination on the mandible: a 3-dimensional finite element stress analysis study.
    Ulusoy C; Darendeliler N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):490.e9-15. PubMed ID: 18405811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An analysis of the corrective contribution in activator treatment.
    Cozza P; De Toffol L; Iacopini L
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):741-8. PubMed ID: 15673134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluating the effect of Sabbagh Universal Spring during treatment of growing class II malocclusions.
    Hanandeh BA; El-Bialy AA
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(4):13-24. PubMed ID: 21314084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Severe dental Class II patient treated by activator followed by headgear therapy--a case report.
    Meller SM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Jul; 106(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 8017344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Treatment effects of Fränkel, activator and extraoral traction appliances.
    Righellis EG
    Angle Orthod; 1983 Apr; 53(2):107-21. PubMed ID: 6576650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Maxillary expansion in Class II correction with orthopedic cervical headgear. A posteroanterior cephalometric study.
    Kirjavainen M; Kirjavainen T
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 12828436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance on patients with Class II malocclusion.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Chermak DS; Kaczynski R; Simon ES; Haerian A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 12637901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cervical headgear vs pendulum appliance for the treatment of moderate skeletal Class II malocclusion.
    Mossaz CF; Byloff FK; Kiliaridis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):616-23. PubMed ID: 18005835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of an anterior biteplate on dental and skeletal Class II correction using headgears: a cephalometric study.
    Thurman MM; King GJ; Ramsay DS; Wheeler TT; Phillips C
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Nov; 14(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 22008301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Evaluation of the changes occurring in the vertical direction of the face in cases treated with activator + occipital headgear combination].
    Altuğ Z; Işeri H; Bayazit Z; Gögen H
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 2489156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.