These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1877554)

  • 41. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles after treatment with headgear or Herbst appliance.
    Sloss EA; Southard KA; Qian F; Stock SE; Mann KR; Meyer DL; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 18405814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Treatment of skeletal class II division 1 malocclusion with mandibular deficiency using myofunctional appliances in growing individuals.
    Pachori Y; Navlani M; Gaur T; Bhatnagar S
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 22565519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance.
    Valant JR; Sinclair PM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Feb; 95(2):138-47. PubMed ID: 2916470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A tensor analysis to evaluate the effect of high-pull headgear on Class II malocclusions.
    Ngan P; Scheick J; Florman M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Mar; 103(3):267-79. PubMed ID: 8456785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Skeletal and dento-alveolar changes as a result of headgear activator therapy related to different vertical growth patterns.
    Dermaut LR; van den Eynde F; de Pauw G
    Eur J Orthod; 1992 Apr; 14(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 1582458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Initial effects of treatment of Class II malocclusion with the Herren activator, activator-headgear combination, and Jasper Jumper.
    Weiland FJ; Ingervall B; Bantleon HP; Droacht H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Jul; 112(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 9228837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Class II: a comparison of activator and activator headgear combination appliances.
    Oztürk Y; Tankuter N
    Eur J Orthod; 1994 Apr; 16(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 8005202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Orthodontic and orthopedic effects of Activator, Activator-HG combination, and Bass appliances: a comparative study.
    Cura N; Sarac M; Oztürk Y; Sürmeli N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jul; 110(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 8686676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The effect of cervical headgear on patients with high or low mandibular plane angles and the "myth" of posterior mandibular rotation.
    Haralabakis NB; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Sep; 126(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 15356494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Mandibular response to orthodontic treatment with the Bionator appliance.
    Mamandras AH; Allen LP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Feb; 97(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 2301298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Dental and skeletal contributions to occlusal correction in patients treated with the high-pull headgear-activator combination.
    Lagerström LO; Nielsen IL; Lee R; Isaacson RJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Jun; 97(6):495-504. PubMed ID: 2353679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Activator headgear therapy.
    Levin RI
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Feb; 87(2):91-109. PubMed ID: 3855608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cervical and oblique headgear: a comparison of treatment effects.
    O'Reilly MT; Nanda SK; Close J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jun; 103(6):504-9. PubMed ID: 8506811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Two Class II, division 1 patients with congenitally missing lower central incisors.
    Fukawa A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Nov; 104(5):425-43. PubMed ID: 8237895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation. An analysis of 70 consecutive cases treated with the Herbst appliance.
    Pancherz H; Hägg U
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Oct; 88(4):273-87. PubMed ID: 3863486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Vertical changes in high-angle Class II, division 1 patients treated with cervical or occipital pull headgear.
    Burke M; Jacobson A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Dec; 102(6):501-8. PubMed ID: 1456230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Enhanced increase in pharyngeal airway size in Japanese class II children following a 1-year treatment with an activator appliance.
    Horihata A; Ueda H; Koh M; Watanabe G; Tanne K
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2013; 24(4):35-40. PubMed ID: 24640074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The initial effects of the treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusions with the van Beek activator compared with the effects of the Herren activator and an activator-headgear combination.
    Altenburger E; Ingervall B
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Aug; 20(4):389-97. PubMed ID: 9753820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Skeletal changes associated with plate-headgear therapy in the early mixed dentition.
    De Baets J; Schatz JP; Joho JP
    J Clin Orthod; 1995 Nov; 29(11):700-5. PubMed ID: 9063171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Are extraoral forces justified in the early treatment of Class II malocclusions?].
    Gebeile-Chauty S; Schott AM; Morra L; Aknin JJ
    Orthod Fr; 2009 Sep; 80(3):265-77. PubMed ID: 19726021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.