These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18775549)
1. Optimization of DGGE community fingerprinting for characterizing Escherichia coli communities associated with fecal pollution. Esseili MA; Kassem II; Sigler V Water Res; 2008 Nov; 42(17):4467-76. PubMed ID: 18775549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis to differentiate Escherichia coli populations in secondary environments. Sigler V; Pasutti L Environ Microbiol; 2006 Oct; 8(10):1703-11. PubMed ID: 16958751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Wildlife identified as major source of Escherichia coli in agriculturally dominated watersheds by BOX A1R-derived genetic fingerprints. Somarelli JA; Makarewicz JC; Sia R; Simon R J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 16551490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of five rep-PCR genomic fingerprinting methods for differentiation of fecal Escherichia coli from humans, poultry and wild birds. Mohapatra BR; Broersma K; Mazumder A FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2007 Dec; 277(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 17986090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Concentrations of host-specific and generic fecal markers measured by quantitative PCR in raw sewage and fresh animal feces. Silkie SS; Nelson KL Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4860-71. PubMed ID: 19765792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fidelity of bacterial source tracking: Escherichia coli vs Enterococcus spp and minimizing assignment of isolates from nonlibrary sources. Hassan WM; Ellender RD; Wang SY J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):591-8. PubMed ID: 17241366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of Escherichia coli BOX-PCR fingerprints to identify sources of fecal contamination of water bodies in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Carlos C; Alexandrino F; Stoppe NC; Sato MI; Ottoboni LM J Environ Manage; 2012 Jan; 93(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 22054569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differentiation of fecal Escherichia coli from poultry and free-living birds by (GTG)5-PCR genomic fingerprinting. Mohapatra BR; Broersma K; Mazumder A Int J Med Microbiol; 2008 Apr; 298(3-4):245-52. PubMed ID: 17572150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sample size, library composition, and genotypic diversity among natural populations of Escherichia coli from different animals influence accuracy of determining sources of fecal pollution. Johnson LK; Brown MB; Carruthers EA; Ferguson JA; Dombek PE; Sadowsky MJ Appl Environ Microbiol; 2004 Aug; 70(8):4478-85. PubMed ID: 15294775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differentiation of faecal Escherichia coli from human and animal sources by random amplified polymorphic DNA-PCR (RAPD-PCR). Venieri D; Vantarakis A; Komninou G; Papapetropoulou M Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(1):193-8. PubMed ID: 15318508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A biomarker for the identification of swine fecal pollution in water, using the STII toxin gene from enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Khatib LA; Tsai YL; Olson BH Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2003 Dec; 63(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 13680204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Considerations when using discriminant function analysis of antimicrobial resistance profiles to identify sources of fecal contamination of surface water in Michigan. Kaneene JB; Miller R; Sayah R; Johnson YJ; Gilliland D; Gardiner JC Appl Environ Microbiol; 2007 May; 73(9):2878-90. PubMed ID: 17337537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microbial source tracking in a small southern California urban watershed indicates wild animals and growth as the source of fecal bacteria. Jiang SC; Chu W; Olson BH; He JW; Choi S; Zhang J; Le JY; Gedalanga PB Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Sep; 76(4):927-34. PubMed ID: 17589839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of host-specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene markers as a complementary tool for detecting fecal pollution in a prairie watershed. Fremaux B; Gritzfeld J; Boa T; Yost CK Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4838-49. PubMed ID: 19604534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiple lines of evidence to identify the sources of fecal pollution at a freshwater beach in Hamilton Harbour, Lake Ontario. Edge TA; Hill S Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3585-94. PubMed ID: 17575998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identification of fecal Escherichia coli from humans and animals by ribotyping. Carson CA; Shear BL; Ellersieck MR; Asfaw A Appl Environ Microbiol; 2001 Apr; 67(4):1503-7. PubMed ID: 11282597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Occurrence of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from surface waters and fecal pollution sources near Hamilton, Ontario. Edge TA; Hill S Can J Microbiol; 2005 Jun; 51(6):501-5. PubMed ID: 16121229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determining the source of fecal contamination in recreational waters. Meyer KJ; Appletoft CM; Schwemm AK; Uzoigwe JC; Brown EJ J Environ Health; 2005; 68(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 16121484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Temporal genetic variability and host sources of Escherichia coli associated with fecal pollution from domesticated animals in the shellfish culture environment of Xiangshan Bay, East China Sea. Fu LL; Shuai JB; Wang Y; Ma HJ; Li JR Environ Pollut; 2011 Oct; 159(10):2808-14. PubMed ID: 21645948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identifying fecal sources in a selected catchment reach using multiple source-tracking tools. Vogel JR; Stoeckel DM; Lamendella R; Zelt RB; Santo Domingo JW; Walker SR; Oerther DB J Environ Qual; 2007; 36(3):718-29. PubMed ID: 17412907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]