These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

537 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18775561)

  • 1. Identifying useable semen.
    Foxcroft GR; Dyck MK; Ruiz-Sanchez A; Novak S; Dixon WT
    Theriogenology; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1324-36. PubMed ID: 18775561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biological markers of boar fertility.
    Dyck MK; Foxcroft GR; Novak S; Ruiz-Sanchez A; Patterson J; Dixon WT
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2011 Sep; 46 Suppl 2():55-8. PubMed ID: 21884279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The predictive value of routine semen evaluation and IVF technology for determining relative boar fertility.
    Ruiz-Sánchez AL; O'donoghue R; Novak S; Dyck MK; Cosgrove JR; Dixon WT; Foxcroft GR
    Theriogenology; 2006 Sep; 66(4):736-48. PubMed ID: 16529803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Porcine field fertility with two different insemination doses and the effect of sperm morphology.
    Alm K; Peltoniemi OA; Koskinen E; Andersson M
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2006 Jun; 41(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 16689883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of genetic selection on management of boar replacement.
    Robinson JA; Buhr MM
    Theriogenology; 2005 Jan; 63(2):668-78. PubMed ID: 15626424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can external quality control improve pig AI efficiency?
    Waberski D; Petrunkina AM; Töpfer-Petersen E
    Theriogenology; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1346-51. PubMed ID: 18656253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimizing semen production for artificial insemination in swine.
    Colenbrander B; Feitsma H; Grooten HJ
    J Reprod Fertil Suppl; 1993; 48():207-15. PubMed ID: 8145205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sperm chromatin structural integrity in normospermic boars is not related to semen storage and fertility after routine AI.
    Waberski D; Schapmann E; Henning H; Riesenbeck A; Brandt H
    Theriogenology; 2011 Jan; 75(2):337-45. PubMed ID: 20961609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of heterospermic inseminations and paternity testing to evaluate the relative contributions of common sperm traits and seminal plasma proteins in boar fertility.
    Flowers WL; Deller F; Stewart KR
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2016 Nov; 174():123-131. PubMed ID: 27707521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fertility results of artificial inseminations performed with liquid boar semen stored in X-cell vs BTS extender.
    Haugan T; Gaustad AH; Reksen O; Gröhn YT; Hofmo PO
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2007 Feb; 42(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 17214781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Field data analysis of boar semen quality.
    Broekhuijse ML; Feitsma H; Gadella BM
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2011 Sep; 46 Suppl 2():59-63. PubMed ID: 21884280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The predictive value of porcine seminal parameters on fertility outcome under commercial conditions.
    Gadea J; Sellés E; Marco MA
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2004 Oct; 39(5):303-8. PubMed ID: 15367261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of boar semen quality in relation to fertility with special reference to methanol stress.
    Sutkeviciene N; Andersson MA; Zilinskas H; Andersson M
    Theriogenology; 2005 Feb; 63(3):739-47. PubMed ID: 15629793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incidence of unilateral fertilizations after low dose deep intrauterine insemination in spontaneously ovulating sows under field conditions.
    Martinez EA; Vazquez JM; Parrilla I; Cuello C; Gil MA; Rodriguez-Martinez H; Roca J; Vazquez JL
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2006 Feb; 41(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 16420327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Field studies of the effect of sperm motility and morphology on the fertility of boars used for insemination].
    Waberski D; Dirksen G; Weitze KF; Leiding C; Hahn R
    Tierarztl Prax; 1990 Dec; 18(6):591-4. PubMed ID: 2080503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship among seminal quality measures and field fertility of young dairy bulls using low-dose inseminations.
    Christensen P; Labouriau R; Birck A; Boe-Hansen GB; Pedersen J; Borchersen S
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Apr; 94(4):1744-54. PubMed ID: 21426963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of insemination-ovulation interval and addition of seminal plasma on sow fertility to insemination of cryopreserved sperm.
    Abad M; Garcia JC; Sprecher DJ; Cassar G; Friendship RM; Buhr MM; Kirkwood RN
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2007 Aug; 42(4):418-22. PubMed ID: 17635780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Semen production and fertility issues related to differences in genetic lines of boars.
    Sonderman JP; Luebbe JJ
    Theriogenology; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1380-3. PubMed ID: 18783820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The value of microscopic semen motility assessment at collection for a commercial artificial insemination center, a retrospective study on factors explaining variation in pig fertility.
    Broekhuijse ML; Soštarić E; Feitsma H; Gadella BM
    Theriogenology; 2012 Apr; 77(7):1466-1479.e3. PubMed ID: 22289218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro maturation and fertilization techniques for assessment of semen quality and boar fertility.
    Xu X; Pommier S; Arbov T; Hutchings B; Sotto W; Foxcroft GR
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Dec; 76(12):3079-89. PubMed ID: 9928613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.