BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18775628)

  • 1. The reproducibility of histological parameters employed in the novel binary grading systems of endometrial cancer.
    Gemer O; Uriev L; Voldarsky M; Gdalevich M; Ben-Dor D; Barak F; Anteby EY; Lavie O
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Mar; 35(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 18775628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prognostic significance and interobserver variability of histologic grading systems for endometrial carcinoma.
    Scholten AN; Smit VT; Beerman H; van Putten WL; Creutzberg CL
    Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 14770433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The comparison of the agreement in determining the histological grade of uterine endometrial endometrioid carcinoma, using the three-grade FIGO classification and the two-grade system.
    Demczuk S; Wierzchowski W; SzczepaƄski W; Dyduch G; Czopek J; Stachura J
    Pol J Pathol; 2003; 54(3):179-81. PubMed ID: 14703284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The reproducibility of a binary tumor grading system for uterine endometrial endometrioid carcinoma, compared with FIGO system and nuclear grading.
    Sagae S; Saito T; Satoh M; Ikeda T; Kimura S; Mori M; Sato N; Kudo R
    Oncology; 2004; 67(5-6):344-50. PubMed ID: 15713989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A binary architectural grading system for uterine endometrial endometrioid carcinoma has superior reproducibility compared with FIGO grading and identifies subsets of advance-stage tumors with favorable and unfavorable prognosis.
    Lax SF; Kurman RJ; Pizer ES; Wu L; Ronnett BM
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2000 Sep; 24(9):1201-8. PubMed ID: 10976693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prognostic impact of histological grade and vascular invasion compared with tumour cell proliferation in endometrial carcinoma of endometrioid type.
    Stefansson IM; Salvesen HB; Immervoll H; Akslen LA
    Histopathology; 2004 May; 44(5):472-9. PubMed ID: 15139995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Original and reviewed nuclear grading according to the Fuhrman system: a multivariate analysis of 388 patients with conventional renal cell carcinoma.
    Ficarra V; Martignoni G; Maffei N; Brunelli M; Novara G; Zanolla L; Pea M; Artibani W
    Cancer; 2005 Jan; 103(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 15573369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognosis and reproducibility of new and existing binary grading systems for endometrial carcinoma compared to FIGO grading in hysterectomy specimens.
    Guan H; Semaan A; Bandyopadhyay S; Arabi H; Feng J; Fathallah L; Pansare V; Qazi A; Abdul-Karim F; Morris RT; Munkarah AR; Ali-Fehmi R
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 May; 21(4):654-60. PubMed ID: 21543931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of three histological grading systems in endometrial cancer.
    Bilgin T; Ozuysal S; Ozan H
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Jun; 272(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 15241614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal pattern of recurrence of stage I endometrial cancer in relation to histological risk factors.
    Ben Arie A; Lavie O; Gdalevich M; Voldarsky M; Barak F; Schneider D; Levy T; Anteby E; Gemer O
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Feb; 38(2):166-9. PubMed ID: 22056646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproducibility of grading systems for endometrial endometrioid carcinoma and their relation with pathologic prognostic parameters.
    Kapucuoglu N; Bulbul D; Tulunay G; Temel MA
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2008; 18(4):790-6. PubMed ID: 17892460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing of two binary grading systems for FIGO stage III serous carcinoma of the ovary and peritoneum.
    Seidman JD; Horkayne-Szakaly I; Cosin JA; Ryu HS; Haiba M; Boice CR; Yemelyanova AV
    Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Nov; 103(2):703-8. PubMed ID: 16828848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of the histologic grading for ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma: a retrospective multi-institutional study by the Japan Clear Cell Carcinoma Study Group.
    Yamamoto S; Kasajima A; Takano M; Yaegashi N; Fujiwara H; Kuzuya K; Kigawa J; Tsuda H; Kurachi H; Kikuchi Y; Sugiyama T; Tsuda H; Moriya T
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2011 Mar; 30(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 21293288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toward the development of a universal grading system for ovarian epithelial carcinoma. I. Prognostic significance of histopathologic features--problems involved in the architectural grading system.
    Shimizu Y; Kamoi S; Amada S; Hasumi K; Akiyama F; Silverberg SG
    Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Jul; 70(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 9698465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stage II endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: clinical implications of cervical stromal invasion.
    Orezzoli JP; Sioletic S; Olawaiye A; Oliva E; del Carmen MG
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 19345400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The prognostic value of semiquantitative nuclear grading in endometrial carcinomas.
    Hachisuga T; Kawarabayashi T; Iwasaka T; Sugimori H; Kamura T; Tsuneyoshi M
    Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Apr; 65(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 9103400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An analysis of two versus three grades for endometrial carcinoma.
    Taylor RR; Zeller J; Lieberman RW; O'Connor DM
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Jul; 74(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 10385544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stage IA vs. IB endometrial stromal sarcoma: does the new staging system predict survival?
    Garg G; Shah JP; Toy EP; Bryant CS; Kumar S; Morris RT
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Jul; 118(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 20447684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of the time interval between hysteroscopy, dilation and curettage, and hysterectomy on survival in patients with endometrial cancer.
    Hefler L; Leipold H; Hinterberger S; Concin N; Klotz R; Reinthaller A
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Nov; 112(5):1098-101. PubMed ID: 18978111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Description of a novel system for grading of endometrial carcinoma and comparison with existing grading systems.
    Alkushi A; Abdul-Rahman ZH; Lim P; Schulzer M; Coldman A; Kalloger SE; Miller D; Gilks CB
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2005 Mar; 29(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 15725797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.