These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1877599)

  • 1. The Hypertension Prevention Trial: assessment of the quality of blood pressure measurements.
    Canner PL; Borhani NO; Oberman A; Cutler J; Prineas RJ; Langford H; Hooper FJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 1991 Aug; 134(4):379-92. PubMed ID: 1877599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inaccuracy of the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer.
    O'Brien E; Mee F; Atkins N; O'Malley K
    Lancet; 1990 Dec; 336(8729):1465-8. PubMed ID: 1979092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Quality assurance in Riva-Rocci blood pressure measurement: simultaneous sphygmomanometry with open and covered pressure display].
    Hartmann B; Weise H; Bassenge E
    Z Kardiol; 1988 Aug; 77(8):537-42. PubMed ID: 3176598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the use of a semiautomated cuff-oscillometric sphygmomanometer in the hypertension clinic.
    Prasad N; Wheeldon NM; MacDonald TM
    Br J Clin Pract; 1994; 48(6):307-9. PubMed ID: 7848794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The trained observer better predicts daytime ABPM diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients than does an automated (Omron) device.
    Graves JW; Grossardt BR; Gullerud RE; Bailey KR; Feldstein J
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 16534405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers.
    Parker D; Liu K; Dyer AR; Giumetti D; Liao YL; Stamler J
    Hypertension; 1988 Mar; 11(3):269-72. PubMed ID: 3280484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Observer error in systolic blood pressure measurement in the elderly. A case for automatic recorders?
    Hla KM; Vokaty KA; Feussner JR
    Arch Intern Med; 1986 Dec; 146(12):2373-6. PubMed ID: 2877645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of observer and patient factors on the occurrence of digit preference for zero in blood pressure measurement in a hypertension specialty clinic: evidence for the need of continued observation.
    Graves JW; Bailey KR; Grossardt BR; Gullerud RE; Meverden RA; Grill DE; Sheps SG
    Am J Hypertens; 2006 Jun; 19(6):567-72. PubMed ID: 16733227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Terminal digit bias in a specialty hypertension faculty practice.
    Thavarajah S; White WB; Mansoor GA
    J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Dec; 17(12):819-22. PubMed ID: 14704725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of TM-2655 oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement.
    Kobalava ZD; Kotovskaya YV; Babaeva LA; Moiseev VS
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 16534410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blood pressure measurements in epidemiological surveys--time to change?
    Hense HW; Stieber J; Kuch B; Keil U
    Z Kardiol; 1996; 85 Suppl 3():66-70. PubMed ID: 8896302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A community-based evaluation of the Vita-Stat automatic blood pressure recorder.
    Salaita K; Whelton PK; Seidler AJ
    Am J Hypertens; 1990 May; 3(5 Pt 1):366-72. PubMed ID: 2350476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated versus manual blood pressure measurement: a randomized crossover trial.
    Heinemann M; Sellick K; Rickard C; Reynolds P; McGrail M
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2008 Aug; 14(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 18715391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
    Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Value of blood pressure of adults depending on method of measurement].
    Wielemborek-Musiał K; Jegier A
    Pol Arch Med Wewn; 2006 Jun; 115(6):529-34. PubMed ID: 17263224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring blood pressure for decision making and quality reporting: where and how many measures?
    Powers BJ; Olsen MK; Smith VA; Woolson RF; Bosworth HB; Oddone EZ
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jun; 154(12):781-8, W-289-90. PubMed ID: 21690592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Automatic measurement of arterial pressure].
    Boaventura I; Fonseca T; Ramalhinho V; da Costa JN
    Rev Port Cardiol; 1993 Feb; 12(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 8461153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of automated blood pressure measurements in clinical trials and registration studies: data from the VALTOP Study.
    Mengden T; Asmar R; Kandra A; Di Giovanni R; Brudi P; Parati G
    Blood Press Monit; 2010 Aug; 15(4):188-94. PubMed ID: 20543666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of the Omron M7 (HEM-780-E) oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol.
    Coleman A; Steel S; Freeman P; de Greeff A; Shennan A
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb; 13(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 18199924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of performance of various sphygmomanometers with intra-arterial blood-pressure readings.
    Hunyor SN; Flynn JM; Cochineas C
    Br Med J; 1978 Jul; 2(6131):159-62. PubMed ID: 678830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.