187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18777931)
1. Evaluation of dose prediction errors and optimization convergence errors of deliverable-based head-and-neck IMRT plans computed with a superposition/convolution dose algorithm.
Mihaylov IB; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2008 Aug; 35(8):3722-7. PubMed ID: 18777931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving IMRT dose accuracy via deliverable Monte Carlo optimization for the treatment of head and neck cancer patients.
Dogan N; Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Lerma F; Wu Y; Fatyga M; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4033-43. PubMed ID: 17153383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of a hybrid MC dose algorithm for IMRT optimization dose evaluation.
Siebers JV; Kawrakow I; Ramakrishnan V
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2853-63. PubMed ID: 17821993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantification of the impact of MLC modeling and tissue heterogeneities on dynamic IMRT dose calculations.
Mihaylov IB; Lerma FA; Fatyga M; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1244-52. PubMed ID: 17500456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MCTP system model based on linear programming optimization of apertures obtained from sequencing patient image data maps.
Ureba A; Salguero FJ; Barbeiro AR; Jimenez-Ortega E; Baeza JA; Miras H; Linares R; Perucha M; Leal A
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081719. PubMed ID: 25086529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of dose prediction error and optimization convergence error in four-dimensional inverse planning of robotic stereotactic lung radiotherapy.
Chan MK; Kwong DL; Tong A; Tam E; Ng SC
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 14(4):4270. PubMed ID: 23835392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of non-standard CT conversion ramps for Monte Carlo verification of 6 MV prostate IMRT plans.
Zarza-Moreno M; Cardoso I; Teixeira N; Jesus AP; Mora G
Phys Med; 2013 Jun; 29(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 22677401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monte Carlo-based dosimetry of head-and-neck patients treated with SIB-IMRT.
Sakthi N; Keall P; Mihaylov I; Wu Q; Wu Y; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich R; Siebers JV
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Mar; 64(3):968-77. PubMed ID: 16458782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incorporating geometric ray tracing to generate initial conditions for intensity modulated arc therapy optimization.
Oliver M; Gladwish A; Craig J; Chen J; Wong E
Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7):3137-50. PubMed ID: 18697539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical comparison of head and neck and prostate IMRT plans using absorbed dose to medium and absorbed dose to water.
Dogan N; Siebers JV; Keall PJ
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(19):4967-80. PubMed ID: 16985281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Direct aperture optimization for IMRT using Monte Carlo generated beamlets.
Bergman AM; Bush K; Milette MP; Popescu IA; Otto K; Duzenli C
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3666-79. PubMed ID: 17089832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incorporating multi-leaf collimator leaf sequencing into iterative IMRT optimization.
Siebers JV; Lauterbach M; Keall PJ; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2002 Jun; 29(6):952-9. PubMed ID: 12094990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of direct clinical consequences of MLC positional errors in volumetric-modulated arc therapy using 3D dosimetry system.
Nithiyanantham K; Mani GK; Subramani V; Mueller L; Palaniappan KK; Kataria T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):296–305. PubMed ID: 26699311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; Sood S; Badkul R; Jiang H; McClinton C; Lominska C; Kumar P; Wang F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):277-293. PubMed ID: 27167284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A two-stage sequential linear programming approach to IMRT dose optimization.
Zhang HH; Meyer RR; Wu J; Naqvi SA; Shi L; D'Souza WD
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(3):883-902. PubMed ID: 20071764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implementation of random set-up errors in Monte Carlo calculated dynamic IMRT treatment plans.
Stapleton S; Zavgorodni S; Popescu IA; Beckham WA
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Feb; 50(3):429-39. PubMed ID: 15773721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code.
Francescon P; Cora S; Chiovati P
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 12607832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Independent absorbed-dose calculation using the Monte Carlo algorithm in volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Haga A; Magome T; Takenaka S; Imae T; Sakumi A; Nomoto A; Igaki H; Shiraishi K; Yamashita H; Ohtomo K; Nakagawa K
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Mar; 9():75. PubMed ID: 24625221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhanced optimization of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans using Monte Carlo generated beamlets.
Mathews J; French SB; Bhagroo S; Pant A; Nazareth DP
Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6053-6067. PubMed ID: 32978967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical comparison of dose calculation using the enhanced collapsed cone algorithm vs. a new Monte Carlo algorithm.
Fotina I; Kragl G; Kroupa B; Trausmuth R; Georg D
Strahlenther Onkol; 2011 Jul; 187(7):433-41. PubMed ID: 21713394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
