These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1877920)

  • 1. The effects of temperature on the setting of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) cements.
    Fricker J; Hirota K; Tamiya Y
    Aust Dent J; 1991 Jun; 36(3):240-2. PubMed ID: 1877920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A laboratory investigation into cements used to retain orthodontic bands.
    Durning P; McCabe JF; Gordon PH
    Br J Orthod; 1994 Feb; 21(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 8199162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative clinical trial of a glass ionomer and a zinc phosphate cement for securing orthodontic bands.
    Stirrups DR
    Br J Orthod; 1991 Feb; 18(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 2025619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retention of orthodontic bands with three different cements.
    Kocadereli I; Ciger S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 7577731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of sandblasting on the retention of orthodontic bands.
    Wood DP; Paleczny GJ; Johnson LN
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 8805916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of triturator speed variation on physical properties of encapsulated glass-ionomer luting cements.
    Rupp DC; Hermesch CB; Charlton DG
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):96-102. PubMed ID: 9002868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strength of attachment between band and glass ionomer cement.
    Dastjerdie EV; Zarnegar H; Behnaz M; Seifi M
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 21175024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A 12-month clinical evaluation of a light-activated glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets.
    Fricker JP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 May; 105(5):502-5. PubMed ID: 8166101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro comparison of orthodontic band cements.
    Millett DT; Duff S; Morrison L; Cummings A; Gilmour WH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jan; 123(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12532057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A 12-month clinical evaluation of a glass polyalkenoate cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets.
    Fricker JP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Apr; 101(4):381-4. PubMed ID: 1558068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct surface pH determinations of setting cements.
    Charlton DG; Moore BK; Swartz ML
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(6):231-8. PubMed ID: 1816545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro fluoride uptake by enamel adjacent to a glass ionomer luting cement.
    Scoville RK; Foreman F; Burgess JO
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1990; 57(5):352-5. PubMed ID: 2212193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bond strength of luting cements to core foundation materials.
    Hewlett S; Wadenya RO; Mante FK
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010 Mar; 31(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 20344899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative laboratory investigation of dual-cured vs. conventional glass ionomer cements for band cementation.
    Millett DT; Kamahli K; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Aug; 68(4):345-50. PubMed ID: 9709835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence of a complex species controlling the setting reaction of glass ionomer cements.
    Dickey B; Price R; Boyd D
    Dent Mater; 2016 Apr; 32(4):596-605. PubMed ID: 26891672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Glass ionomer cements used as bonding materials for metal orthodontic brackets. An in vitro study.
    Oen JO; Gjerdet NR; Wisth PJ
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Jun; 13(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 1834474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Resin-modified glass ionomer, modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation?--an in vitro evaluation.
    Millett DT; Cummings A; Letters S; Roger E; Love J
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Dec; 25(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 14700267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three cements used for orthodontic banding of porcelain molars.
    Herion T; Ferracane JL; Covell DA
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Jan; 77(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 17029542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The bond strength of a glass polyalkenoate cement to enamel and stainless steel.
    Fricker JP; Kameda A
    Aust Orthod J; 1990 Mar; 11(3):161-3. PubMed ID: 2152431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.