322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18779799)
21. Transgenic crops. China takes a bumpy road from the lab to the field.
Yimin D; Mervis J
Science; 2002 Dec; 298(5602):2317-9. PubMed ID: 12493892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Drugs in crops--the unpalatable truth.
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Feb; 22(2):133. PubMed ID: 14755274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. EPA's proposed biotech policy turns a deaf ear to science.
Fedoroff N; Haselkorn R; Chassy BM
FASEB J; 2011 Sep; 25(9):2855-7. PubMed ID: 21880667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Democratization is more than lower prices.
Cayford J
Science; 2003 Jul; 301(5630):167; author reply 167. PubMed ID: 12855789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Caution in China over GM crops.
Niu C
Science; 2003 Feb; 299(5609):1013. PubMed ID: 12586923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The gap between science and perception: the case of plant biotechnology in Europe.
Einsele A
Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():1-11. PubMed ID: 17522817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biosafety legislation and biotechnology development gains momentum in Africa.
Wafula D; Waithaka M; Komen J; Karembu M
GM Crops Food; 2012; 3(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 22430854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Barriers and paths to market for genetically engineered crops.
Rommens CM
Plant Biotechnol J; 2010 Feb; 8(2):101-11. PubMed ID: 19968823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Canada. Monsanto wins split decision in patent fight over GM crop.
Kondro W
Science; 2004 May; 304(5675):1229. PubMed ID: 15166338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Science, politics, and the GM debate in Europe.
Tencalla F
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Feb; 44(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 16188360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The status of GM rice R&D in China.
Wang Y; Johnston S
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Jul; 25(7):717-8. PubMed ID: 17621287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Transgenic harvest.
Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7316):633-4. PubMed ID: 20930796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Regulation of GM crops in Argentina.
Burachik M
GM Crops Food; 2012; 3(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 22614638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Biotechnology. Japanese controversies over transgenic crop regulation.
Watanabe KN; Taeb M; Okusu H
Science; 2004 Sep; 305(5690):1572. PubMed ID: 15361611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Withdrawn Greenpeace Bt suit enters spin cycle.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):920. PubMed ID: 10973201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Gaps, inexperience, inconsistencies, and overlaps: crisis in the regulation of genetically modified plants and animals.
Mandal GN
William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Apr; 45(5):2167-259. PubMed ID: 16329219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Regulatory regimes for transgenic crops.
Schubert D
Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Jul; 23(7):785-7; author reply 787-9. PubMed ID: 16003351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Food: Inside the hothouses of industry.
Gilbert N
Nature; 2010 Jul; 466(7306):548-51. PubMed ID: 20671688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. US regulatory system for genetically modified [genetically modified organism (GMO), rDNA or transgenic] crop cultivars.
McHughen A; Smyth S
Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Jan; 6(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 17956539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Water: more crop per drop.
Marris E
Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7185):273-7. PubMed ID: 18354452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
