746 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18779808)
1. DNA-based patents: an empirical analysis.
Mills AE; Tereskerz P
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Sep; 26(9):993-5. PubMed ID: 18779808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Science and the law. Working through the patent problem.
Walsh JP; Cohen WM; Arora A
Science; 2003 Feb; 299(5609):1021. PubMed ID: 12586928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Intellectual property protection for plant-related inventions in Europe.
Fleck B; Baldock C
Nat Rev Genet; 2003 Oct; 4(10):834-8. PubMed ID: 14526379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intellectual property. U.S. patent reform begins long journey through Congress.
Kintisch E
Science; 2005 Jun; 308(5729):1725-6. PubMed ID: 15961638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Intellectual property. Patents, secrecy, and DNA.
Cook-Deegan RM; McCormack SJ
Science; 2001 Jul; 293(5528):217. PubMed ID: 11452101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Bayh-Dole: if we knew then what we know now.
Boettiger S; Bennett AB
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Mar; 24(3):320-3. PubMed ID: 16525405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. How can you patent genes?
Eisenberg RS
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(3):3-11. PubMed ID: 12230840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enforcing pharmaceutical and biotech patent rights in China.
Zhang YP; Deng MM
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Nov; 26(11):1235-40. PubMed ID: 18997760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Patent first, ask questions later: morality and biotechnology in patent law.
Bagley MA
William Mary Law Rev; 2003 Dec; 45(2):469-547. PubMed ID: 15570677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patenting for the research scientist: an update.
Crespi RS
Trends Biotechnol; 2004 Dec; 22(12):638-42. PubMed ID: 15542154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Supreme Court's war on intellectual property.
Gardner JN
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Jan; 18(1):101-2. PubMed ID: 10625402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomedical patents and ethics: a Canadian solution.
Gold ER
McGill Law J; 2000 May; 45(2):413-35. PubMed ID: 12688288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intellectual property. Decision on NFkappaB patent could have broad implications for biotech.
Garber K
Science; 2006 May; 312(5775):827. PubMed ID: 16690824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Intellectual property. Court tightens patent rules on gene tags.
Kintisch E
Science; 2005 Sep; 309(5742):1797-9. PubMed ID: 16166482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Patents on life? No patent on life!].
van Raden L
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1998 Mar; 105(3):90-3. PubMed ID: 9581373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The scope of utility in the twenty-first century: new guidance for gene-related patents.
Summers TM
Georgetown Law J; 2003 Jan; 91(2):475-509. PubMed ID: 15046071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Intellectual property. Depth charges aimed at Columbia's 'submarine patent'.
Marshall E
Science; 2003 Jul; 301(5632):448. PubMed ID: 12881539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Intellectual property rights. Public sector collaboration for agricultural IP management.
Atkinson RC; Beachy RN; Conway G; Cordova FA; Fox MA; Holbrook KA; Klessig DF; McCormick RL; McPherson PM; Rawlings HR; Rapson R; Vanderhoef LN; Wiley JD; Young CE
Science; 2003 Jul; 301(5630):174-5. PubMed ID: 12855794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Conflicts brewing as phage display gets complex.
Glaser V
Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Jun; 15(6):506. PubMed ID: 9181564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. International patent law-boon or bane of biotech?
Basu P
Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Jan; 23(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 15637604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
