These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18780237)

  • 41. Design considerations for fume hoods for process plants.
    Goodfellow HD; Bender M
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1980 Jul; 41(7):473-84. PubMed ID: 7415967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Computational fluid dynamics as a method for assessing fume cupboard performance.
    Nicholson GP; Clark RP; de Calcina-Goff ML
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2000 May; 44(3):203-17. PubMed ID: 10775669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Flow characteristics and spillage mechanisms of wall-mounted and jet-isolated range hoods subject to influence from cross draft.
    Chen JK; Huang RF; Peng KL
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 22150435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Returning perchlorate-contaminated fume hood systems to service. Part II. Disassembly, decontamination, disposal, and analytical procedures.
    Bader M; Phillips CC; Mueller TR; Underwood WS; Whitson SD
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 1999 Jun; 14(6):369-75. PubMed ID: 10429731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Hard metal exposures. Part 2: Prospective exposure assessment.
    Simcox NJ; Stebbins A; Guffey S; Atallah R; Hibbard R; Camp J
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2000 Apr; 15(4):342-53. PubMed ID: 10750278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Particle release and control of worker exposure during laboratory-scale synthesis, handling and simulated spills of manufactured nanomaterials in fume hoods.
    Fonseca AS; Kuijpers E; Kling KI; Levin M; Koivisto AJ; Nielsen SH; Fransman W; Fedutik Y; Jensen KA; Koponen IK
    J Nanopart Res; 2018; 20(2):48. PubMed ID: 29497347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Flow dynamics and contaminant transport in industrial-type enclosing exhaust hoods.
    Karaismail E; Celik I; Guffey SE
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(7):384-96. PubMed ID: 23697648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Choosing the right fume hood.
    Hacker E
    Occup Health Saf; 2006 May; 75(5):66-8. PubMed ID: 16734288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A simple method for fume cupboard performance assessment.
    Nicholson GP; Clark RP; Grover F; de Calcina-Goff ML
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2000 Jun; 44(4):291-300. PubMed ID: 10831733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of flow characteristics on ultrafine particle emissions from range hoods.
    Tseng LC; Chen CC
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Aug; 57(7):920-33. PubMed ID: 23479025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Experimental characterization of a plume of passive contaminant above a thermal source: capture efficiency of a fume extraction hood.
    Devienne R; Fontaine JR; Kicka J; Bonthoux F
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Oct; 53(7):739-48. PubMed ID: 19666957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Universal fume hood testing.
    Koenigsberg J
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 12705288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Computer simulation in the design of local exhaust hoods for shielded metal arc welding.
    Tum Suden KD; Flynn MR; Goodman R
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 Mar; 51(3):115-26. PubMed ID: 2327323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Quantitative evaluation of chemical fume hoods performance by CO2 tracer gas.
    Ghorbani-Shahna F; Feiz-Arefi M
    Work; 2022; 71(3):771-778. PubMed ID: 35253687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Local exhaust ventilation for the control of welding fumes in the construction industry--a literature review.
    Flynn MR; Susi P
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Aug; 56(7):764-76. PubMed ID: 22459321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Experimental study on centerline velocities of a rectangular capture hood under realistic conditions.
    He X; Lewis BV; Guffey SE
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2018 Feb; 15(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 29157142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Exposure to airborne particles associated with the handling of graphene nanoplatelets.
    Spinazzè A; Cattaneo A; Borghi F; Del Buono L; Campagnolo D; Rovelli S; Cavallo DM
    Med Lav; 2018 Aug; 109(4):285-296. PubMed ID: 30168501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Correlation between airflow patterns and performance of a laboratory fume hood.
    Tseng LC; Huang RF; Chen CC; Chang CP
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Dec; 3(12):694-706. PubMed ID: 17133690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Predicting worker exposure--the effect of ventilation velocity, free-stream turbulence and thermal condition.
    Li J; Yavuz I; Celik I; Guffey S
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Nov; 4(11):864-74. PubMed ID: 17917950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Manganese and welding fume exposure and control in construction.
    Meeker JD; Susi P; Flynn MR
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Dec; 4(12):943-51. PubMed ID: 17963139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.