308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18780338)
21. Diagnostic accuracy of serum-carcinoembryonic antigen in recurrent colorectal cancer: a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
Körner H; Söreide K; Stokkeland PJ; Söreide JA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):417-23. PubMed ID: 17103264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Follow-up after melanoma resection is more extensive than recommended in the practice guidelines, primarily for reassurance of the patient].
Mijnhout GS; Teule GJ; Hoekstra OS; Pijpers R; Borgstein PJ; Meijer S
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 May; 143(19):997-1001. PubMed ID: 10368721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.
Rex DK; Kahi CJ; Levin B; Smith RA; Bond JH; Brooks D; Burt RW; Byers T; Fletcher RH; Hyman N; Johnson D; Kirk L; Lieberman DA; Levin TR; O'Brien MJ; Simmang C; Thorson AG; Winawer SJ; ;
Gastroenterology; 2006 May; 130(6):1865-71. PubMed ID: 16697749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Patient compliance and efficacy of diagnostic procedures in the surveillance of colorectal cancer: experience from a cancer center].
Riedl S; Lux T; Abel U; Theuer D
Z Gastroenterol; 2005 Apr; 43(4):357-65. PubMed ID: 15830301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Carcinoembryonic antigen and patterns of recurrence after curative resection of the colorectal cancer.
Park JY; Lee KH
Hepatogastroenterology; 2007; 54(79):1966-9. PubMed ID: 18251140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [The role of colonoscopy in patient follow-up after surgery for colorectal cancer. A retrospective study and review of the literature].
Romano G; Cocchiara G; Maniaci S; Buscemi G; Calderone F; Gioè FP; Romano M
G Chir; 2007 Oct; 28(10):399-402. PubMed ID: 17915057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Receipt of colorectal testing prior to colorectal carcinoma diagnosis.
Cooper GS; Payes JD
Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(4):696-701. PubMed ID: 15643638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Follow-up of patients after curative surgery for colorectal cancer].
Wille-Jørgensen PA; Madsen MR
Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Oct; 167(44):4189-91. PubMed ID: 16266577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Improvable quality of diagnostic assessment of colorectal cancer in southern Netherlands.
van Steenbergen LN; Lemmens VE; Straathof JW; Nijhuis PH; Gelderman WA; Coebergh JW
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 May; 21(5):570-5. PubMed ID: 19190499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of the Danish national strategy for selective use of colonoscopy in symptomatic outpatients without known risk factors for colorectal cancer.
Bjerregaard NC; Tøttrup A; Sørensen HT; Laurberg S
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):228-36. PubMed ID: 17327943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Physician follow-up and observation of guidelines in the post treatment surveillance of colorectal cancer.
Vargas GM; Sheffield KM; Parmar AD; Han Y; Brown KM; Riall TS
Surgery; 2013 Aug; 154(2):244-55. PubMed ID: 23889952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Tumor markers in patients with relapse of colorectal carcinoma.
Lipská L; Visokai V; Levý M; Svobodová S; Kormunda S; Fínek J
Anticancer Res; 2007; 27(4A):1901-5. PubMed ID: 17649792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The use of preventive health services among elderly uterine cancer survivors.
McBean AM; Yu X; Virnig BA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 198(1):86.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18166316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A population-based study of follow-up care for Hodgkin lymphoma survivors: opportunities to improve surveillance for relapse and late effects.
Hodgson DC; Grunfeld E; Gunraj N; Del Giudice L
Cancer; 2010 Jul; 116(14):3417-25. PubMed ID: 20564062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Negative serum carcinoembryonic antigen has insufficient accuracy for excluding recurrence from patients with Dukes C colorectal cancer: analysis with likelihood ratio and posttest probability in a follow-up study.
Hara M; Kanemitsu Y; Hirai T; Komori K; Kato T
Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1675-80. PubMed ID: 18633674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Postpolypectomy and post-cancer resection surveillance.
Rex DK
Rev Gastroenterol Disord; 2003; 3(4):202-9. PubMed ID: 14668692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. American Society of Clinical Oncology-recommended surveillance and physician specialty among long-term breast cancer survivors.
Hollowell K; Olmsted CL; Richardson AS; Pittman HK; Bellin L; Tafra L; Verbanac KM
Cancer; 2010 May; 116(9):2090-8. PubMed ID: 20198707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) measurement during follow-up for rectal carcinoma is useful even if normal levels exist before surgery. A retrospective study of CEA values in the TME trial.
Grossmann I; de Bock GH; Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg WM; van de Velde CJ; Wiggers T
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 33(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 17174516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical significance of microvessel count in patients with metastatic liver cancer originating from colorectal carcinoma.
Nanashima A; Shibata K; Nakayama T; Tobinaga S; Araki M; Kunizaki M; Takeshita H; Hidaka S; Sawai T; Nagayasu T; Yasutake T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):2130-7. PubMed ID: 19495885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Timing of repeat colonoscopy: disparity between guidelines and endoscopists' recommendation.
Krist AH; Jones RM; Woolf SH; Woessner SE; Merenstein D; Kerns JW; Foliaco W; Jackson P
Am J Prev Med; 2007 Dec; 33(6):471-8. PubMed ID: 18022063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]