195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18780883)
1. The EXCITE Trial: Predicting a clinically meaningful motor activity log outcome.
Park SW; Wolf SL; Blanton S; Winstein C; Nichols-Larsen DS
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2008; 22(5):486-93. PubMed ID: 18780883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is CIMT a rehabilitative practice for everyone? Predictive factors and feasibility.
Fabbrini S; Casati G; Bonaiuti D
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2014 Oct; 50(5):505-14. PubMed ID: 24704938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mental practice with motor imagery: evidence for motor recovery and cortical reorganization after stroke.
Butler AJ; Page SJ
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 87(12 Suppl 2):S2-11. PubMed ID: 17140874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint-induced movement therapy: the EXCITE randomised trial.
Wolf SL; Winstein CJ; Miller JP; Thompson PA; Taub E; Uswatte G; Morris D; Blanton S; Nichols-Larsen D; Clark PC
Lancet Neurol; 2008 Jan; 7(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 18077218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Home-based constraint-induced movement therapy for patients with upper limb dysfunction after stroke (HOMECIMT): a cluster-randomised, controlled trial.
Barzel A; Ketels G; Stark A; Tetzlaff B; Daubmann A; Wegscheider K; van den Bussche H; Scherer M
Lancet Neurol; 2015 Sep; 14(9):893-902. PubMed ID: 26231624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reduced-intensity modified constraint-induced movement therapy versus conventional therapy for upper extremity rehabilitation after stroke: a multicenter trial.
Smania N; Gandolfi M; Paolucci S; Iosa M; Ianes P; Recchia S; Giovanzana C; Molteni F; Avesani R; Di Paolo P; Zaccala M; Agostini M; Tassorelli C; Fiaschi A; Primon D; Ceravolo MG; Farina S
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2012; 26(9):1035-45. PubMed ID: 22661278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial.
Wolf SL; Winstein CJ; Miller JP; Taub E; Uswatte G; Morris D; Giuliani C; Light KE; Nichols-Larsen D;
JAMA; 2006 Nov; 296(17):2095-104. PubMed ID: 17077374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting clinically significant changes in motor and functional outcomes after robot-assisted stroke rehabilitation.
Hsieh YW; Lin KC; Wu CY; Lien HY; Chen JL; Chen CC; Chang WH
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Feb; 95(2):316-21. PubMed ID: 24113336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Potential predictors of motor and functional outcomes after distributed constraint-induced therapy for patients with stroke.
Lin KC; Huang YH; Hsieh YW; Wu CY
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2009 May; 23(4):336-42. PubMed ID: 18984830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ability of three motor measures to predict functional outcomes reported by stroke patients after rehabilitation.
Li KY; Lin KC; Wang TN; Wu CY; Huang YH; Ouyang P
NeuroRehabilitation; 2012; 30(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 22672940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Botulinum toxin a, evidence-based exercise therapy, and constraint-induced movement therapy for upper-limb hemiparesis attributable to stroke: a preliminary study.
Levy CE; Giuffrida C; Richards L; Wu S; Davis S; Nadeau SE
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Sep; 86(9):696-706. PubMed ID: 17709993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke.
Lang CE; Edwards DF; Birkenmeier RL; Dromerick AW
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Sep; 89(9):1693-700. PubMed ID: 18760153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized, multicenter, comparative study of NEURO versus CIMT in poststroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis: the NEURO-VERIFY Study.
Abo M; Kakuda W; Momosaki R; Harashima H; Kojima M; Watanabe S; Sato T; Yokoi A; Umemori T; Sasanuma J
Int J Stroke; 2014 Jul; 9(5):607-12. PubMed ID: 24015934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: efficacy for patients with minimal upper-extremity motor ability.
Bonifer NM; Anderson KM; Arciniegas DB
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 86(9):1867-73. PubMed ID: 16181956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of modified-constraint induced movement therapy based telerehabilitation on upper extremity motor functions in stroke patients.
Saygili F; Guclu-Gunduz A; Eldemir S; Eldemir K; Ozkul C; Gursoy GT
Brain Behav; 2024 Jun; 14(6):e3569. PubMed ID: 38873866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attempting to improve function and quality of life using the FTM Protocol: case report.
Butler A; Blanton S; Rowe V; Wolf S
J Neurol Phys Ther; 2006 Sep; 30(3):148-56. PubMed ID: 17029658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences in neural pathways are related to the short- or long-term benefits of constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with chronic stroke and hemiparesis: a pilot cohort study.
Takebayashi T; Marumoto K; Takahashi K; Domen K
Top Stroke Rehabil; 2018 Apr; 25(3):203-208. PubMed ID: 29130404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modification of constraint induced movement therapy in the home health setting for a subject with chronic hemiparesis after stroke.
Hicks CM; Kluding P
J Geriatr Phys Ther; 2008; 31(3):113-9. PubMed ID: 19856617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can the Wolf Motor Function Test be streamlined?
Bogard K; Wolf S; Zhang Q; Thompson P; Morris D; Nichols-Larsen D
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2009 Jun; 23(5):422-8. PubMed ID: 19276293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A modified method for constraint-induced movement therapy: a supervised self-training protocol.
Hosomi M; Koyama T; Takebayashi T; Terayama S; Kodama N; Matsumoto K; Domen K
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2012 Nov; 21(8):767-75. PubMed ID: 21596584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
