These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18781075)

  • 1. Reliability and clinical relevance of segmental analysis based on intelligibility assessment.
    Van Nuffelen G; De Bodt M; Guns C; Wuyts F; Van de Heyning P
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(5):264-8. PubMed ID: 18781075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech technology-based assessment of phoneme intelligibility in dysarthria.
    Van Nuffelen G; Middag C; De Bodt M; Martens JP
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2009; 44(5):716-30. PubMed ID: 18821111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hybridizing conversational and clear speech to determine the degree of contribution of acoustic features to intelligibility.
    Kain A; Amano-Kusumoto A; Hosom JP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2308-19. PubMed ID: 19062869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic recognition of pathological phoneme production.
    Wielgat R; Zieliński TP; Woźniak T; Grabias S; Król D
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(6):323-31. PubMed ID: 19011305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The effect of time-compressed speech on the perception of ataxic dysarthria: a report of two cases].
    Woisard-Bassols V; Espesser R; Ghio A; Nguyen N; Duez D
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2010; 62(4):185-94. PubMed ID: 20460931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of coarticulatory information in normal speech and dysarthria.
    Tjaden K; Sussman J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 49(4):888-902. PubMed ID: 16908883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of intelligibility using children's spontaneous speech: methodological aspects.
    Lagerberg TB; Åsberg J; Hartelius L; Persson C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2014; 49(2):228-39. PubMed ID: 24304870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Objective acoustic-phonetic speech analysis in patients treated for oral or oropharyngeal cancer.
    de Bruijn MJ; ten Bosch L; Kuik DJ; Quené H; Langendijk JA; Leemans CR; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(3):180-7. PubMed ID: 19571552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing speech intelligibility of pathological speech in sentences and word lists: The contribution of phoneme-level measures.
    Xue W; van Hout R; Cucchiarini C; Strik H
    J Commun Disord; 2023; 102():106301. PubMed ID: 36709701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of speech disorders in children with cleft lip and palate.
    Paal S; Reulbach U; Strobel-Schwarthoff K; Nkenke E; Schuster M
    J Orofac Orthop; 2005 Jul; 66(4):270-8. PubMed ID: 16044225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing children's speech intelligibility and oral structures, and functions via an Internet-based telehealth system.
    Waite MC; Theodoros DG; Russell TG; Cahill LM
    J Telemed Telecare; 2012 Jun; 18(4):198-203. PubMed ID: 22604277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of audiologists' ratings of the intelligibility of hearing-impaired children's speech.
    Doyle J
    Ear Hear; 1987 Jun; 8(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 3609513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Toward phonetic intelligibility testing in dysarthria.
    Kent RD; Weismer G; Kent JF; Rosenbek JC
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1989 Nov; 54(4):482-99. PubMed ID: 2811329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Telediagnostic assessment of intelligibility in dysarthria: a pilot investigation of MVP-online.
    Ziegler W; Zierdt A
    J Commun Disord; 2008; 41(6):553-77. PubMed ID: 18582894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic quantification of speech intelligibility of adults with oral squamous cell carcinoma.
    Windrich M; Maier A; Kohler R; Noth E; Nkenke E; Eysholdt U; Schuster M
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 18340110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forced-choice analysis of segmental production by Chinese-accented English speakers.
    Rogers CL; Dalby J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 48(2):306-22. PubMed ID: 15989394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The cleft audit protocol for speech-augmented: A validated and reliable measure for auditing cleft speech.
    John A; Sell D; Sweeney T; Harding-Bell A; Williams A
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2006 May; 43(3):272-88. PubMed ID: 16681400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of the number of presentations on listener transcriptions and reliability in the assessment of speech intelligibility in children.
    Lagerberg TB; Johnels JÅ; Hartelius L; Persson C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2015 Jul; 50(4):476-87. PubMed ID: 25588966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Munich Intelligibility Profile. Studies of reliability and validity].
    Ziegler W; Hartmann E
    Nervenarzt; 1993 Oct; 64(10):653-8. PubMed ID: 8232679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech rate effects upon intelligibility and acceptability of dysarthric speech.
    Dagenais PA; Brown GR; Moore RE
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):141-8. PubMed ID: 16428230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.