These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18781075)

  • 21. Speech intelligibility of deaf speakers and distinctive feature usage.
    Mencke EO; Ochsner GJ; Testut EW
    J Aud Res; 1984 Jan; 24(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 6543865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Rasch analysis of word identification and magnitude estimation scaling responses in measuring naive listeners' judgments of speech intelligibility of children with severe-to-profound hearing impairments.
    Beltyukova SA; Stone GM; Ellis LW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1124-37. PubMed ID: 18664707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The assessment of speech intelligibility in adults.
    Dongilli PA; Bernthal JE; Beukelman DR
    Clin Commun Disord; 1991; 1(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 1844817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Phoneme analysis and phoneme discrimination of juvenile speech therapy school students].
    Franz S; Rosanowski F; Eysholdt U; Hoppe U
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 May; 90(5):282-9. PubMed ID: 20941685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Production variability and single word intelligibility in aphasia and apraxia of speech.
    Haley KL; Martin G
    J Commun Disord; 2011; 44(1):103-15. PubMed ID: 20822776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intelligibility of speech produced during simultaneous communication.
    Whitehead RL; Schiavetti N; MacKenzie DJ; Metz DE
    J Commun Disord; 2004; 37(3):241-53. PubMed ID: 15063145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Measurement of intelligibility in disordered speech.
    Klein ES; Flint CB
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2006 Jul; 37(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 16837442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Validation of an Intelligibility Test Based on Acoustic-Phonetic Decoding of Pseudo-Words: Overall Results from Patients with Cancer of the Oral Cavity and the Oropharynx.
    Ghio A; Lalain M; Rebourg M; Marczyk A; Fredouille C; Woisard V
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2022; 74(3):209-222. PubMed ID: 34547750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reliability results of perceptual ratings of resonance, nasal airflow and speech acceptability in patients with cleft palate by Ugandan speech-language pathologists following a two-day workshop.
    Bruneel L; Alighieri C; D'haeseleer E; Kissel I; Adriaansen A; Sseremba D; Van Lierde K
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Sep; 136():110191. PubMed ID: 32593063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Speech outcome regarding overall intelligibility, articulation, resonance and voice in Flemish children a year after pharyngeal flap surgery. A pilot study.
    Van Lierde KM; Bonte K; Baudonck N; Van Cauwenberge P; De Leenheer EM
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(5):223-32. PubMed ID: 18698142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Speech assessment in cleft palate patients: a descriptive study.
    Rullo R; Di Maggio D; Festa VM; Mazzarella N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 May; 73(5):641-4. PubMed ID: 19181392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Subjective and objective effects of fast and slow compression on the perception of reverberant speech in listeners with hearing loss.
    Shi LF; Doherty KA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1328-40. PubMed ID: 18664685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of rate control on speech rate and intelligibility of dysarthric speech.
    Van Nuffelen G; De Bodt M; Wuyts F; Van de Heyning P
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 19287175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of listening conditions and listener characteristics on intelligibility of dysarthric speech.
    Pennington L; Miller N
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 May; 21(5):393-403. PubMed ID: 17468997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The importance of narrow phonetic transcription for highly unintelligible speech: some examples.
    Ball M; Müller N; Klopfenstein M; Rutter B
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2009; 34(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 19449253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Single-Word Speech Intelligibility in Children and Adults With Down Syndrome.
    Wild A; Vorperian HK; Kent RD; Bolt DM; Austin D
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 Feb; 27(1):222-236. PubMed ID: 29214307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of training on the acoustic phonetic representation of synthetic speech.
    Francis AL; Nusbaum HC; Fenn K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Dec; 50(6):1445-65. PubMed ID: 18055767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Application of automatic speech recognition to quantitative assessment of tracheoesophageal speech with different signal quality.
    Haderlein T; Riedhammer K; Nöth E; Toy H; Schuster M; Eysholdt U; Hornegger J; Rosanowski F
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 19122460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of training on naïve listeners' judgments of the speech intelligibility of children with severe-to-profound hearing loss.
    Ellis LW; Beltyukova SA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1114-23. PubMed ID: 18664708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Diagnosis of dysarthria with the "Munich Intelligibility Profile"--construction of the procedure and its use].
    Ziegler W; Hartmann E; Wiesner I
    Nervenarzt; 1992 Oct; 63(10):602-8. PubMed ID: 1436250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.