BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18781368)

  • 1. Cementless femoral prostheses cost more to implant than cemented femoral prostheses.
    Unnanuntana A; Dimitroulias A; Bolognesi MP; Hwang KL; Goodman SB; Marcus RE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 467(6):1546-51. PubMed ID: 18781368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost of implanting a cemented versus cementless femoral stem.
    Barrack RL; Castro F; Guinn S
    J Arthroplasty; 1996 Jun; 11(4):373-6. PubMed ID: 8792242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is Cemented or Cementless Femoral Stem Fixation More Durable in Patients Older Than 75 Years of Age? A Comparison of the Best-performing Stems.
    Tanzer M; Graves SE; Peng A; Shimmin AJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jul; 476(7):1428-1437. PubMed ID: 29683803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
    Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of mid-term clinical results between cementless and cemented femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty with femoral shortening osteotomy for Crowe type IV hips.
    Inoue D; Kabata T; Kajino Y; Ohmori T; Ueoka K; Tsuchiya H
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2021 Jun; 141(6):1057-1064. PubMed ID: 33484302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vivo implant fixation of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK hip prostheses in an ovine model.
    Nakahara I; Takao M; Bandoh S; Bertollo N; Walsh WR; Sugano N
    J Orthop Res; 2013 Mar; 31(3):485-92. PubMed ID: 23097319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The cost analysis of cemented versus cementless total hip replacement operations on the NHS.
    Kallala R; Anderson P; Morris S; Haddad FS
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Jul; 95-B(7):874-6. PubMed ID: 23814235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contemporary total hip arthroplasty with and without cement in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
    Kim YH; Oh SH; Kim JS; Koo KH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Apr; 85(4):675-81. PubMed ID: 12672844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early Migration Predicts Aseptic Loosening of Cementless Femoral Stems: A Long-term Study.
    Streit MR; Haeussler D; Bruckner T; Proctor T; Innmann MM; Merle C; Gotterbarm T; Weiss S
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jul; 474(7):1697-706. PubMed ID: 27130649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Postoperative 30-day complications after cemented/hybrid versus cementless total hip arthroplasty in osteoarthritis patients > 70 years.
    Lindberg-Larsen M; Petersen PB; Jørgensen CC; Overgaard S; Kehlet H;
    Acta Orthop; 2020 Jun; 91(3):286-292. PubMed ID: 32285735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cemented femoral stem fixation through the anterior approach has fewer early complications than cementless fixation.
    Ennin KA; Elsharkawy KA; Dasgupta S; Emerson RH
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Jul; 103-B(7 Supple B):33-37. PubMed ID: 34192902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Increased risk of periprosthetic femur fractures associated with a unique cementless stem design.
    Watts CD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ; Hanssen AD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2045-53. PubMed ID: 25502478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The European school of total hip arthroplasty and 35 years of total hip arthroplasty in the Czech Republic.
    Cech O; Dzupa V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2005; 72(1):57-76. PubMed ID: 15860155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost comparison of cementless versus cemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures.
    Tripuraneni KR; Carothers JT; Junick DW; Archibeck MJ
    Orthopedics; 2012 Oct; 35(10):e1461-4. PubMed ID: 23027480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Twenty-Five- to Twenty-Seven-Year Results of a Cemented vs a Cementless Stem in the Same Patients Younger Than 50 Years of Age.
    Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Kim IW
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Mar; 31(3):662-7. PubMed ID: 26601637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A critical look at cementless stems. Taper designs and when to use alternatives.
    Bourne RB; Rorabeck CH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):212-23. PubMed ID: 9917606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are There Long-term Benefits to Cementing the Metaphyseal Stem in Hip Resurfacing?
    Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ; Bhaurla SK
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 473(10):3197-203. PubMed ID: 26100255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Polished Cemented Femoral Stems Have a Lower Rate of Revision Than Matt Finished Cemented Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 96,315 Cemented Femoral Stems.
    Hoskins W; van Bavel D; Lorimer M; de Steiger RN
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 May; 33(5):1472-1476. PubMed ID: 29310918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A rough surface finish adversely affects the survivorship of a cemented femoral stem.
    Della Valle AG; Zoppi A; Peterson MG; Salvati EA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 Jul; (436):158-63. PubMed ID: 15995435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro stability of cemented and cementless femoral stems with compaction.
    Chareancholvanich K; Bourgeault CA; Schmidt AH; Gustilo RB; Lew WD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Jan; (394):290-302. PubMed ID: 11795746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.