211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18781516)
1. Hearing instrument fittings of pre-school children: do we meet the prescription goals?
Strauss S; van Dijk C
Int J Audiol; 2008; 47 Suppl 1():S62-71. PubMed ID: 18781516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of RECD transducer when deriving real-ear sound pressure level.
Munro KJ; Millward KE
Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):409-23. PubMed ID: 16825890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prescribed real-ear and achieved real-life differences in children's hearing aids adjusted according to the NAL-NL1 and the DSL v.4.1 prescriptions.
Ching TY; Scollie SD; Dillon H; Seewald R; Britton L; Steinberg J
Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49 Suppl 1():S16-25. PubMed ID: 20109083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the desired sensation level [input/output] algorithm for adults with hearing loss: the acceptable range for amplified conversational speech.
Jenstad LM; Bagatto MP; Seewald RC; Scollie SD; Cornelisse LE; Scicluna R
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):793-811. PubMed ID: 17982367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effects of Manufacturer's Prefit and Real-Ear Fitting on the Predicted Speech Perception of Children with Severe to Profound Hearing Loss.
Quar TK; Umat C; Chew YY
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):346-356. PubMed ID: 30461383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The national protocol for paediatric amplification in Australia.
King AM
Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49 Suppl 1():S64-9. PubMed ID: 19919326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Children's speech perception and loudness ratings when fitted with hearing aids using the DSL v.4.1 and the NAL-NL1 prescriptions.
Scollie SD; Ching TY; Seewald RC; Dillon H; Britton L; Steinberg J; King K
Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49 Suppl 1():S26-34. PubMed ID: 20109085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 in Hearing Aids Fit to Children with Severe or Profound Hearing Loss: Goodness of Fit-to-Targets, Impacts on Predicted Loudness and Speech Intelligibility.
Ching TY; Quar TK; Johnson EE; Newall P; Sharma M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):260-74. PubMed ID: 25751694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A cross-over, double-blind comparison of the NAL-NL1 and the DSL v4.1 prescriptions for children with mild to moderately severe hearing loss.
Ching TY; Scollie SD; Dillon H; Seewald R
Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49 Suppl 1():S4-15. PubMed ID: 20109088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Test-retest reliability of probe-microphone verification in children fitted with open and closed hearing aid tips.
Kim H; Ricketts TA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):635-42. PubMed ID: 24047950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preferred signal path delay and high-pass cut-off in open fittings.
Bramsløw L
Int J Audiol; 2010 Sep; 49(9):634-44. PubMed ID: 20602601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Audiometric configurations of hearing impaired children in Hong Kong: implications for amplification.
Yuen KC; McPherson B
Disabil Rehabil; 2002 Nov; 24(17):904-13. PubMed ID: 12519486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of Hearing Aid Manufacturers' Software-Derived Fittings to DSL v5.0 Pediatric Targets.
Folkeard P; Bagatto M; Scollie S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 May; 31(5):354-362. PubMed ID: 31639078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using the Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference within the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Protocols for Applying and Predicting Earmold RECDs.
Moodie S; Pietrobon J; Rall E; Lindley G; Eiten L; Gordey D; Davidson L; Moodie KS; Bagatto M; Haluschak MM; Folkeard P; Scollie S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):264-275. PubMed ID: 26967366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are real-ear measurements (REM) accurate when using the modified pressure with stored equalization (MPSE) method?
Shaw P
Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):463-6. PubMed ID: 20192873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of variations in hearing-aid frequency response on real-life functional performance of children with severe or profound hearing loss.
Ching TY; Hill M; Dillon H
Int J Audiol; 2008 Aug; 47(8):461-75. PubMed ID: 18698522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Own voice qualities (OVQ) in hearing-aid users: there is more than just occlusion.
Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Maas P; Nielsen C
Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 21275499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sound source localization using hearing aids with microphones placed behind-the-ear, in-the-canal, and in-the-pinna.
Van den Bogaert T; Carette E; Wouters J
Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):164-76. PubMed ID: 21208034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceptual Implications of Level- and Frequency-Specific Deviations from Hearing Aid Prescription in Children.
McCreery RW; Brennan M; Walker EA; Spratford M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):861-875. PubMed ID: 28972473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Infant hearing loss in South Africa: age of intervention and parental needs for support.
van der Spuy T; Pottas L
Int J Audiol; 2008; 47 Suppl 1():S30-5. PubMed ID: 18781511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
