These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1878327)

  • 21. Evidence of muscle role over the cranio-facial skull development in Angle's Class III dental malocclusion under the clinical rest position.
    Gomes AC; Vitti M; Regalo SC; Semprini M; Siéssere S; Watanabe PC; Palomari ET
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2008; 48(8):335-41. PubMed ID: 19097473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Secular trend as a factor of craniofacial morphological changes].
    Gazi-Coklica V; Muretić Z
    Acta Stomatol Croat; 1991; 25(3):135-42. PubMed ID: 1819940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Heritability of 39 orthodontic cephalometric parameters on MZ, DZ twins and MN-paired singletons.
    Manfredi C; Martina R; Grossi GB; Giuliani M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Jan; 111(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 9009923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [A cephalometric comparison of skeletal profile and soft tissue profile on adults with normal occlusion].
    Seren E
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 2101666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Association between craniofacial morphology and fiber-type distributions in human masseter and medial pterygoid muscles.
    Shaughnessy T; Fields H; Westbury J
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1989; 4(3):145-55. PubMed ID: 2639923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study.
    Lohrmann B; Schwestka-Polly R; Nägerl H; Ihlow D; Kubein-Meesenburg D
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 17142259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of incompetent lip seal on the growth and development of craniofacial complex.
    Drevensek M; Stefanac-Papić J; Farcnik F
    Coll Antropol; 2005 Dec; 29(2):429-34. PubMed ID: 16417139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Chronological versus skeletal age, an evaluation of craniofacial growth.
    Fishman LS
    Angle Orthod; 1979 Jul; 49(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 225970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Craniofacial morphology and occlusal variation in monozygous and dizygous twins.
    Lobb WK
    Angle Orthod; 1987 Jul; 57(3):219-33. PubMed ID: 3477969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
    Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Semilongitudinal cephalometric study of craniofacial growth in untreated Class III malocclusion.
    Alexander AE; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):700.e1-14; discussion 700-1. PubMed ID: 19524825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The angle between the Frankfort horizontal and the sella-nasion line. Changes in porion and orbitale position during growth.
    Greiner P; Müller B; Dibbets J
    J Orofac Orthop; 2004 May; 65(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 15160248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Importance of growth for evaluation of craniofacial morphology in identical twins].
    Velísková E
    Cesk Stomatol; 1977 Jul; 77(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 269021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Craniofacial growth in untreated skeletal Class I subjects with low, average, and high MP-SN angles: a longitudinal study.
    Chung CH; Mongiovi VD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Dec; 124(6):670-8. PubMed ID: 14666080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The angulation of the base of the skull--a determining factor for facial skeletal development? The significance of the angulation of the base of the skull].
    Sielaff R
    Dtsch Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1991; 79(5):365-73. PubMed ID: 1932431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Effect of breathing mode and nose ventilation on growth of the facial bones].
    Baumann I; Plinkert PK
    HNO; 1996 May; 44(5):229-34. PubMed ID: 8707626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Spatial position of mandibular third molars in monozygotic twins.
    Efstratiadis SS; Kent RL; Lebret LM; Moorrees CF
    Angle Orthod; 1984 Oct; 54(4):271-82. PubMed ID: 6594958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Path analysis of family resemblance for cranio-facial traits in Andhra Pradesh nuclear families and twins.
    Byard PJ; Poosha DV; Satyanarayana M; Rao DC; Russell JM
    Ann Hum Biol; 1985; 12(4):305-14. PubMed ID: 4041159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Facial soft tissue growth in identical twins.
    Hersberger-Zurfluh MA; Papageorgiou SN; Motro M; Kantarci A; Will LA; Eliades T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Nov; 154(5):683-692. PubMed ID: 30384939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Variation of the sella-nasion plane and its effect on SNA and SNB.
    Moore JW
    J Oral Surg; 1976 Jan; 34(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 1059748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.