These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18783684)

  • 1. Endoscopic requirements of colorectal cancer screening programs in average-risk population. Estimation according to a Markov model.
    Rodríguez-Moranta F; Trapero-Bertran M; Castells A; Mas-Canal X; Balaguer F; Pellisé M; Gonzalo V; Ocaña T; Trilla A; Piqué JM
    Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008; 31(7):405-12. PubMed ID: 18783684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population.
    Frazier AL; Colditz GA; Fuchs CS; Kuntz KM
    JAMA; 2000 Oct; 284(15):1954-61. PubMed ID: 11035892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening: comparison of community-based flexible sigmoidoscopy with fecal occult blood testing and colonoscopy.
    O'Leary BA; Olynyk JK; Neville AM; Platell CF
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2004 Jan; 19(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 14675241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
    Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness simulation and analysis of colorectal cancer screening in Hong Kong Chinese population: comparison amongst colonoscopy, guaiac and immunologic fecal occult blood testing.
    Wong CK; Lam CL; Wan YF; Fong DY
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Oct; 15():705. PubMed ID: 26471036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
    Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost effectiveness and projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening in France.
    Hassan C; Benamouzig R; Spada C; Ponchon T; Zullo A; Saurin JC; Costamagna G
    Endoscopy; 2011 Sep; 43(9):780-93. PubMed ID: 21623557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized trial of different screening strategies for colorectal cancer: patient response and detection rates.
    Segnan N; Senore C; Andreoni B; Arrigoni A; Bisanti L; Cardelli A; Castiglione G; Crosta C; DiPlacido R; Ferrari A; Ferraris R; Ferrero F; Fracchia M; Gasperoni S; Malfitana G; Recchia S; Risio M; Rizzetto M; Saracco G; Spandre M; Turco D; Turco P; Zappa M;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Mar; 97(5):347-57. PubMed ID: 15741571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.
    Sonnenberg A; Delcò F; Inadomi JM
    Ann Intern Med; 2000 Oct; 133(8):573-84. PubMed ID: 11033584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What is the best screening strategy to detect advanced colorectal adenomas? Simulation from ongoing Italian screening experiences.
    Ventura L; Zappa M; Carreras G; Ciatto S; Grazzini G
    Tumori; 2011; 97(5):547-50. PubMed ID: 22158481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness analysis on screening for colorectal neoplasm and management of colorectal cancer in Asia.
    Tsoi KK; Ng SS; Leung MC; Sung JJ
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Aug; 28(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 18638075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review.
    Vernon SW
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Oct; 89(19):1406-22. PubMed ID: 9326910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of colorectal cancer screening on life expectancy.
    Inadomi JM; Sonnenberg A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 May; 51(5):517-23. PubMed ID: 10805834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Colorectal cancer test use--Maryland, 2002-2006.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2007 Sep; 56(36):932-6. PubMed ID: 17851446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    Zauber AG; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Knudsen AB; Wilschut J; van Ballegooijen M; Kuntz KM
    Ann Intern Med; 2008 Nov; 149(9):659-69. PubMed ID: 18838717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fecal DNA testing compared with conventional colorectal cancer screening methods: a decision analysis.
    Song K; Fendrick AM; Ladabaum U
    Gastroenterology; 2004 May; 126(5):1270-9. PubMed ID: 15131787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is there endoscopic capacity to provide colorectal cancer screening to the unscreened population in the United States?
    Seeff LC; Manninen DL; Dong FB; Chattopadhyay SK; Nadel MR; Tangka FK; Molinari NA
    Gastroenterology; 2004 Dec; 127(6):1661-9. PubMed ID: 15578502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost effectiveness of CT colonography for UK NHS colorectal cancer screening of asymptomatic adults aged 60-69 years.
    Lee D; Muston D; Sweet A; Cunningham C; Slater A; Lock K
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2010; 8(3):141-54. PubMed ID: 20369905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.