These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18784874)

  • 1. [The relationship between the stability of microimplants and factors of gender and age].
    Ji GP; Yu Q; Shen G
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Aug; 17(4):360-3. PubMed ID: 18784874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of microimplants in orthodontic anchorage.
    Chen CH; Chang CS; Hsieh CH; Tseng YC; Shen YS; Huang IY; Yang CF; Chen CM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Aug; 64(8):1209-13. PubMed ID: 16860211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical and histological comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants in dogs.
    Chen Y; Shin HI; Kyung HM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 18174070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term evaluation of factors affecting removal torque of microimplants.
    Kim HJ; Park HS
    Prog Orthod; 2021 Nov; 22(1):42. PubMed ID: 34778924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Potential of self-drilling orthodontic microimplants under immediate loading.
    Chen Y; Lee JW; Cho WH; Kyung HM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):496-502. PubMed ID: 20362909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical and histologic analysis of the stability of microimplants with immediate orthodontic loading in dogs.
    Chen Y; Kang ST; Bae SM; Kyung HM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):260-7. PubMed ID: 19651357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal asymmetric thread for orthodontic microimplants: Laboratory and clinical evaluation.
    Alrbata RH; Ha DW; Yu W; Kyung HM
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):585-90. PubMed ID: 25286340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bicortical microimplant with 2 anchorage heads for mesial movement of posterior tooth in the beagle dog.
    Wu JC; Huang JN; Zhao SF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 17826604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Placement angle effects on the success rate of orthodontic microimplants and other factors with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Jung YR; Kim SC; Kang KH; Cho JH; Lee EH; Chang NY; Chae JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Feb; 143(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 23374923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Primary stability and histomorphometric bone-implant contact of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants.
    Çehreli S; Arman-Özçırpıcı A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 22284286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Ammayappan P; Kandaswamy R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bone density effects on the success rate of orthodontic microimplants evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Lee MY; Park JH; Kim SC; Kang KH; Cho JH; Cho JW; Chang NY; Chae JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 26827978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surface characteristics and mechanical behavior of retrieved orthodontic microimplants.
    Lu L; Park HS
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2018 May; 19(5):372-382. PubMed ID: 29732748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiographic and surgical template for placement of orthodontic microimplants in interradicular areas: a technical note.
    Wu JC; Huang JN; Zhao SF; Xu XJ; Xie ZJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):629-34. PubMed ID: 16955616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences of treatment outcomes between self-ligating brackets with microimplant and headgear anchorages in adults with bimaxillary protrusion.
    Chen M; Li ZM; Liu X; Cai B; Wang DW; Feng ZC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 25836006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment of a Class II deepbite with microimplant anchorage.
    Park HS; Kim JY; Kwon TG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):397-406. PubMed ID: 21392696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment effects of microimplant-aided sliding mechanics on distal retraction of posterior teeth.
    Oh YH; Park HS; Kwon TG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):470-81. PubMed ID: 21457858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of antibiotic prophylaxis on the stability of orthodontic microimplants: A pilot randomized controlled trial.
    Łyczek J; Kawala B; Antoszewska-Smith J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 May; 153(5):621-631. PubMed ID: 29706210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan.
    Wu TY; Kuang SH; Wu CH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1595-9. PubMed ID: 19615569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Expectations, acceptance, and preferences regarding microimplant treatment in orthodontic patients: A randomized controlled trial.
    Baxmann M; McDonald F; Bourauel C; Jäger A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):250.e1-250.e10; discussion 250-1. PubMed ID: 20816284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.