These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18784874)

  • 21. Occlusal plane change after intrusion of maxillary posterior teeth by microimplants to avoid maxillary surgery with skeletal Class III orthognathic surgery.
    Park HS; Kim JY; Kwon TG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):631-40. PubMed ID: 21055605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Severe bidentoalveolar protrusion treated with orthodontic microimplant-dependent en-masse retraction.
    Chung KR; Nelson G; Kim SH; Kook YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):105-15. PubMed ID: 17628258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Motoyoshi M; Yoshida T; Ono A; Shimizu N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 17974113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of late removal after treatment on the removal torque of microimplants.
    Kim HJ; Park HS
    Korean J Orthod; 2022 May; 52(3):201-209. PubMed ID: 35418519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the stability of self-drilling mini-implants for maxillary anchorage under immediate loading.
    Lifshitz AB; Muñoz M
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):352-6. PubMed ID: 21491001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Stability of a locking plate and self-drilling screws as orthodontic skeletal anchorage in the maxilla: a retrospective study.
    Hibi H; Sakai K; Oda T; Hattori H; Ueda M; Sakai M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Aug; 68(8):1783-7. PubMed ID: 20466474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Revisiting the stability of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.
    Yao CC; Chang HH; Chang JZ; Lai HH; Lu SC; Chen YJ
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2015 Nov; 114(11):1122-8. PubMed ID: 25260551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Gripping and Anchoring Effects on the Mechanical Strengths of Orthodontic Microimplants.
    Chen CM; Ting CC; Wang HC; Tseng YC
    Implant Dent; 2018 Jun; 27(3):288-293. PubMed ID: 29781832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical application of micro-implant anchorage in initial orthodontic retraction.
    Wahabuddin S; Mascarenhas R; Iqbal M; Husain A
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Feb; 41(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 23573806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Placement and removal torque values of orthodontic miniscrew implants.
    Suzuki EY; Suzuki B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):669-78. PubMed ID: 21536211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative study between conventional en-masse retraction (sliding mechanics) and en-masse retraction using orthodontic micro implant.
    Basha AG; Shantaraj R; Mogegowda SB
    Implant Dent; 2010 Apr; 19(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 20386216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Failure rates of mini-implants placed in the infrazygomatic region.
    Uribe F; Mehr R; Mathur A; Janakiraman N; Allareddy V
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():31. PubMed ID: 26373730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison and measurement of the amount of anchorage loss of the molars with and without the use of implant anchorage during canine retraction.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Pavithranand A; Rajasigamani K; Kyung HM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):551-4. PubMed ID: 16627183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems.
    Chen YJ; Chang HH; Huang CY; Hung HC; Lai EH; Yao CC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Dec; 18(6):768-75. PubMed ID: 17868386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical applications of orthodontic microimplant anchorage in craniofacial patients.
    Vachiramon A; Urata M; Kyung HM; Yamashita DD; Yen SL
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2009 Mar; 46(2):136-46. PubMed ID: 19254050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of in-vivo failure of single-thread and dual-thread temporary anchorage devices over 18 months: A split-mouth randomized controlled trial.
    Durrani OK; Shaheed S; Khan A; Bashir U
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Oct; 152(4):451-457. PubMed ID: 28962727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment of stability of orthodontic mini-implants under orthodontic loading: A computed tomography study.
    Garg KK; Gupta M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 26275187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Relationship between vertical skeletal pattern and success rate of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Moon CH; Park HK; Nam JS; Im JS; Baek SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 20620833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stability of miniplates and miniscrews used for orthodontic anchorage: experience with 492 temporary anchorage devices.
    Chen YJ; Chang HH; Lin HY; Lai EH; Hung HC; Yao CC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1188-96. PubMed ID: 18983323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. C-orthodontic microimplant for distalization of mandibular dentition in Class III correction.
    Chung K; Kim SH; Kook Y
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jan; 75(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 15747827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.