These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1878542)

  • 21. Effect of diagnostic radioisotopes and radiographic contrast media on measurements of lumbar spine bone mineral density and body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
    Sala A; Webber C; Halton J; Morrison J; Beaumont L; Zietak A; Barr R
    J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 16731437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Basic study of bone mineral density in os calcis by single energy X-ray absorptiometry].
    Aoyama T; Ito T; Kato T; Suzuki T; Shibata H; Kawabe M; Hara K; Terashi A
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Oct; 53(10):1188-94. PubMed ID: 8255749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [The initial results of lumbar dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) compared to double-energy quantitative computed tomography (DE-QCT)].
    Link J; Zwaan M; Weiss HD; Borgis KJ; Bätge B
    Rofo; 1993 May; 158(5):475-8. PubMed ID: 8490157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Comparative studies with quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry on bone density in renal osteopathy].
    Funke M; Mäurer J; Grabbe E; Scheler F
    Rofo; 1992 Aug; 157(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 1515623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Technical aspects and clinical interpretation of bone mineral measurements.
    Wahner H
    Public Health Rep; 1989; 104 Suppl(Suppl):27-30. PubMed ID: 2517697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Precision in quantitative CT: impact of x-ray dose and matrix size.
    Goodsitt MM; Johnson RH
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(4):1025-36. PubMed ID: 1518464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of lateral versus anterior-posterior spine dual energy x-ray absorptiometry for the diagnosis of osteopenia.
    Finkelstein JS; Cleary RL; Butler JP; Antonelli R; Mitlak BH; Deraska DJ; Zamora-Quezada JC; Neer RM
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 1994 Mar; 78(3):724-30. PubMed ID: 8126149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Lateral dual-photon absorptiometry: a new technique to measure the bone mineral density at the lumbar spine.
    Uebelhart D; Duboeuf F; Meunier PJ; Delmas PD
    J Bone Miner Res; 1990 May; 5(5):525-31. PubMed ID: 2368632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Measurements of bone mineral density of lumbar vertebrae in the lateral projection by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry--comparison with anteroposterior spinal and radial bone mineral measurements].
    Kagawa T
    Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Jan; 67(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 8454926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Lumbar bone mineral density in patients with major depression: evidence of increased bone loss at follow-up.
    Schweiger U; Weber B; Deuschle M; Heuser I
    Am J Psychiatry; 2000 Jan; 157(1):118-20. PubMed ID: 10618024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Measuring bone mineral density: let me count the ways! Flat-panel volumetric CT: another new tool!
    Weigert JM
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):391-3. PubMed ID: 19268849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A phantom for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by QCT and DXA: design considerations and specifications.
    Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(3):583-6. PubMed ID: 1508094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Adaptation of computed tomography and roentgenography to bone density measurements].
    Tatoń G; Korkosz M; Głuszko P; Kuśmiderski J; Rokita E; Urbanik A
    Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(7-8):494-7. PubMed ID: 10575916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measurement of bone mineral density.
    Hassager C; Christiansen C
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1995 Jul; 57(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 7671157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. X-ray absorptiometry in bone mineral analysis.
    Sartoris DJ; Resnick D
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1990 Feb; 12(2):108-13, 159, 183. PubMed ID: 10149346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hounsfield unit values for estimation of bone mineral density.
    Lee JC; Delaney FT
    Br J Neurosurg; 2023 Dec; 37(6):1948. PubMed ID: 34092164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bone mineral density in cystic fibrosis patients using low-dose chest computed tomography: a pilot study.
    Feijó Andrade RG; Forte GC; Hochhegger B; Pinto LA
    Eur Respir J; 2019 Jun; 53(6):. PubMed ID: 30923186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. New prospects in CT image processing via mathematical morphology.
    Prêteux F; Laval-Jeantet AM; Roger B; Laval-Jeantet MH
    Eur J Radiol; 1985 Nov; 5(4):313-7. PubMed ID: 3910435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Bone mineral assessment].
    Yamada H
    Radioisotopes; 1989 Nov; 38(11):473-84. PubMed ID: 2687957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry artifact and potential pitfall: the nonremovable umbilical ring.
    Bohdiewicz PJ; Khan AM
    Clin Nucl Med; 2002 Dec; 27(12):911-2. PubMed ID: 12607883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.