BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18786725)

  • 1. Photosensor of environmental persistence for chemical risk assessment.
    Campanella L; Costanza C
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Jan; 72(1):261-272. PubMed ID: 18786725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of chemometric methods to environmental analysis of organic pollutants: A review.
    Mas S; de Juan A; Tauler R; Olivieri AC; Escandar GM
    Talanta; 2010 Jan; 80(3):1052-67. PubMed ID: 20006053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Environmental risk assessment of selected organic chemicals based on TOC test and QSAR estimation models.
    Chi Y; Zhang H; Huang Q; Lin Y; Ye G; Zhu H; Dong S
    J Environ Sci (China); 2018 Feb; 64():23-31. PubMed ID: 29478644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The regulation of hazardous chemicals: role of ecotoxicology in decision making.
    Vighi M
    Biotherapy; 1998; 11(2-3):105-11. PubMed ID: 9677041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PestScreen: a screening approach for scoring and ranking pesticides by their environmental and toxicological concern.
    Juraske R; Antón A; Castells F; Huijbregts MA
    Environ Int; 2007 Oct; 33(7):886-93. PubMed ID: 17509686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can the Stockholm convention address the spectrum of chemicals currently under regulatory scrutiny? Advocating a more prominent role for modeling in POP screening assessment.
    McLachlan MS
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2018 Jan; 20(1):32-37. PubMed ID: 29322155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tracking POPs across the planet.
    Betts K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Aug; 40(16):4814-5. PubMed ID: 16955868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward a consistent evaluative framework for POP risk characterization.
    Arnot JA; Armitage JM; McCarty LS; Wania F; Cousins IT; Toose-Reid L
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 21053945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Life cycle toxicity assessment of pesticides used in integrated and organic production of oranges in the Comunidad Valenciana, Spain.
    Juraske R; Sanjuán N
    Chemosphere; 2011 Feb; 82(7):956-62. PubMed ID: 21075421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emerging POPs. A special session at "Dioxin 2008" in Birmingham.
    Rose M; Falandysz J
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2008; 59(4):473-81, 483-92. PubMed ID: 19227259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rating systems for pesticide risk classification on different ecosystems.
    Finizio A; Calliera M; Vighi M
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2001 Jul; 49(3):262-74. PubMed ID: 11440480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pesticide risk assessment and management in a globally changing world--report from a European interdisciplinary workshop.
    Babut M; Arts GH; Barra Caracciolo A; Carluer N; Domange N; Friberg N; Gouy V; Grung M; Lagadic L; Martin-Laurent F; Mazzella N; Pesce S; Real B; Reichenberger S; Roex EW; Romijn K; Röttele M; Stenrød M; Tournebize J; Vernier F; Vindimian E
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2013 Nov; 20(11):8298-312. PubMed ID: 23975709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ERICA: A multiparametric toxicological risk index for the assessment of environmental healthiness.
    Boriani E; Mariani A; Baderna D; Moretti C; Lodi M; Benfenati E
    Environ Int; 2010 Oct; 36(7):665-74. PubMed ID: 20542570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Review of laboratory-based terrestrial bioaccumulation assessment approaches for organic chemicals: Current status and future possibilities.
    Hoke R; Huggett D; Brasfield S; Brown B; Embry M; Fairbrother A; Kivi M; Paumen ML; Prosser R; Salvito D; Scroggins R
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2016 Jan; 12(1):109-22. PubMed ID: 26272585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conscious worst case definition for risk assessment, part II: a methodological case study for pesticide risk assessment.
    Sørensen PB; Giralt F; Rallo R; Espinosa G; Münier B; Gyldenkaerne S; Thomsen M
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Aug; 408(18):3860-70. PubMed ID: 20015539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nanopesticides: guiding principles for regulatory evaluation of environmental risks.
    Kookana RS; Boxall AB; Reeves PT; Ashauer R; Beulke S; Chaudhry Q; Cornelis G; Fernandes TF; Gan J; Kah M; Lynch I; Ranville J; Sinclair C; Spurgeon D; Tiede K; Van den Brink PJ
    J Agric Food Chem; 2014 May; 62(19):4227-40. PubMed ID: 24754346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the ranking of chemicals based on their PBT characteristics: comparison of different ranking methodologies using selected POPs as an illustrative example.
    Sailaukhanuly Y; Zhakupbekova A; Amutova F; Carlsen L
    Chemosphere; 2013 Jan; 90(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 22955049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A rule-based screening environmental risk assessment tool derived from EUSES.
    Verdonck FA; Boeije G; Vandenberghe V; Comber M; de Wolf W; Feijtel T; Holt M; Koch V; Lecloux A; Siebel-Sauer A; Vanrolleghem PA
    Chemosphere; 2005 Mar; 58(9):1169-76. PubMed ID: 15667838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pesticide risk management using indicators for vineyards in the central valley of Chile.
    Nario A; Capri E; Balderacchi M; Pino I; Parada AM; Videla X; Luzio W; Casanova M; Seguel O
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Jul; 5(3):476-82. PubMed ID: 20050034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Seeing chemicals in environmental samples.
    Wild E; Jones KC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Sep; 41(17):5934-8. PubMed ID: 17937263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.