BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18786800)

  • 1. Partin Tables cannot accurately predict the pathological stage at radical prostatectomy.
    Bhojani N; Ahyai S; Graefen M; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Shariat SF; Jeldres C; Erbersdobler A; Schlomm T; Haese A; Steuber T; Heinzer H; Montorsi F; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Feb; 35(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 18786800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of accuracy between the Partin tables of 1997 and 2001 to predict final pathological stage in clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Augustin H; Eggert T; Wenske S; Karakiewicz PI; Palisaar J; Daghofer F; Huland H; Graefen M
    J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):177-81. PubMed ID: 14665871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. External validation of the updated partin tables in a cohort of French and Italian men.
    Bhojani N; Salomon L; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Shariat SF; Jeldres C; Zini L; Pharand D; Péloquin F; Arjane P; Abbou CC; De La Taille A; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Feb; 73(2):347-52. PubMed ID: 19004573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transition zone cancers undermine the predictive accuracy of Partin table stage predictions.
    Steuber T; Karakiewicz PI; Augustin H; Erbersdobler A; Lange I; Haese A; Chun KH; Walz J; Graefen M; Huland H
    J Urol; 2005 Mar; 173(3):737-41. PubMed ID: 15711259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multi-institutional external validation of seminal vesicle invasion nomograms: head-to-head comparison of Gallina nomogram versus 2007 Partin tables.
    Zorn KC; Capitanio U; Jeldres C; Arjane P; Perrotte P; Shariat SF; Lee DI; Shalhav AL; Zagaja GP; Shikanov SA; Gofrit ON; Thong AE; Albala DM; Sun L; Karakiewicz PI
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Apr; 73(5):1461-7. PubMed ID: 18938046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of 1997 Partin Tables' lymph node invasion predictions in men treated with radical prostatectomy in Montreal Quebec.
    Karakiewicz PI; Lattouf JB; Perrotte P; Valiquette L; Bénard F; McCormack M; Ménard C; Lebeau T; Benayoun S; Ramirez A; Ouaknine S; Saad F
    Can J Urol; 2005 Apr; 12(2):2588-92. PubMed ID: 15877940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. External validation of the updated Partin tables in a cohort of North American men.
    Karakiewicz PI; Bhojani N; Capitanio U; Reuther AM; Suardi N; Jeldres C; Pharand D; Péloquin F; Perrotte P; Shariat SF; Klein EA
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):898-902; discussion 902-3. PubMed ID: 18635222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of Partin tables for predicting pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Partin AW; Walsh PC; Kattan MW; Scardino PT; Montie JE; Pearson JD; Slezak JM; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1591-5. PubMed ID: 11025711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prostate cancers detected by saturation repeat biopsy impairs the Partin tables' accuracy to predict final pathological stage.
    Augustin H; Auprich M; Mannweiler S; Pachernegg O; Al-Ali BM; Pummer K
    BJU Int; 2012 Aug; 110(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 22093162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The newer the better? Comparison of the 1997 and 2001 partin tables for pathologic stage prediction of prostate cancer in China.
    Gao X; Ren S; Lu X; Xu C; Sun Y
    Urology; 2008 Nov; 72(5):1096-101. PubMed ID: 18822453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of accuracy among three generations of Partin tables in a Chinese cohort.
    Xiao WJ; Ye DW; Yao XD; Zhang SL; Dai B; Wang CF; Wang J; Zhang HL; Shen YJ; Zhu Y; Zhu YP; Shi GH; Ma CG; Qin XJ; Lin GW
    Can J Urol; 2011 Apr; 18(2):5619-24. PubMed ID: 21504650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and split-sample validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of seminal vesicle invasion at radical prostatectomy.
    Gallina A; Chun FK; Briganti A; Shariat SF; Montorsi F; Salonia A; Erbersdobler A; Rigatti P; Valiquette L; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
    Eur Urol; 2007 Jul; 52(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 17267098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of Partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus on Gleason grading: data from the Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate Cancer.
    Naito S; Kuroiwa K; Kinukawa N; Goto K; Koga H; Ogawa O; Murai M; Shiraishi T;
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):904-9; discussion 909-10. PubMed ID: 18635221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. External validation of the 2007 and 2001 Partin tables in Irish prostate cancer patients.
    Fanning DM; Fan Y; Fitzpatrick JM; Watson RW
    Urol Int; 2010; 84(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 20215821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of 2001 Partin tables in Turkey: a multicenter study.
    Eskicorapci SY; Karabulut E; Türkeri L; Baltaci S; Cal C; Toktas G; Akpinar H; Ozer G; Sozen S; Tokuc R; Lekili M; Soylu A; Albayrak S; Sahin H; Alpar R; Ozen H
    Eur Urol; 2005 Feb; 47(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 15661412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are Partin tables suitable for Chinese patients with prostate cancer?
    Shen XC; Qiu YQ; Zheng YC; Zhang SZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Nov; 125(21):3795-9. PubMed ID: 23106876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prostate-specific antigen improves the ability of clinical stage and biopsy Gleason sum to predict the pathologic stage at radical prostatectomy in the new millennium.
    Chun FK; Briganti A; Gallina A; Hutterer GC; Shariat SF; Antebie E; Walz J; Roehrborn CG; Salonia A; Rigatti P; Saad F; Huland H; Montorsi F; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
    Eur Urol; 2007 Oct; 52(4):1067-74. PubMed ID: 17383807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Head-to-head comparison of three commonly used preoperative tools for prediction of lymph node invasion at radical prostatectomy.
    Abdollah F; Schmitges J; Sun M; Thuret R; Djahangirian O; Tian Z; Shariat SF; Briganti A; Perrotte P; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI
    Urology; 2011 Dec; 78(6):1363-7. PubMed ID: 22137704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing 3-T multiparametric MRI and the Partin tables to predict organ-confined prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
    Gupta RT; Faridi KF; Singh AA; Passoni NM; Garcia-Reyes K; Madden JF; Polascik TJ
    Urol Oncol; 2014 Nov; 32(8):1292-9. PubMed ID: 24863013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictive ability of partin tables 2001 in a Welsh population.
    Ayyathurai R; Ananthakrishnan K; Rajasundaram R; Knight RJ; Toussi H; Srinivasan V
    Urol Int; 2006; 76(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 16601382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.