These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18786857)

  • 1. Links between eye movement preparation and the attentional processing of tactile events: an event-related brain potential study.
    Gherri E; Eimer M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Nov; 119(11):2587-97. PubMed ID: 18786857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eye movement preparation causes spatially-specific modulation of auditory processing: new evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Gherri E; Driver J; Eimer M
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1224():88-101. PubMed ID: 18614157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Crossing the hands disrupts tactile spatial attention but not motor attention: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Gherri E; Forster B
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(9):2303-16. PubMed ID: 22683449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Manual response preparation and saccade programming are linked to attention shifts: ERP evidence for covert attentional orienting and spatially specific modulations of visual processing.
    Eimer M; Van Velzen J; Gherri E; Press C
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 16448629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The orienting of attention during eye and hand movements: ERP evidence for similar frame of reference but different spatially specific modulations of tactile processing.
    Gherri E; Forster B
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Oct; 91(2):172-84. PubMed ID: 22750676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Covert unimanual response preparation triggers attention shifts to effectors rather than goal locations.
    Forster B; Eimer M
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 419(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 17485166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ERP correlates of shared control mechanisms involved in saccade preparation and in covert attention.
    Eimer M; Van Velzen J; Gherri E; Press C
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1135(1):154-66. PubMed ID: 17198687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal dynamics of lateralized ERP components elicited during endogenous attentional shifts to relevant tactile events.
    van Velzen J; Forster B; Eimer M
    Psychophysiology; 2002 Nov; 39(6):874-8. PubMed ID: 12462516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Covert manual response preparation triggers attentional modulations of visual but not auditory processing.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 May; 117(5):1063-74. PubMed ID: 16516545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Covert manual response preparation triggers attentional shifts: ERP evidence for the premotor theory of attention.
    Eimer M; Forster B; Van Velzen J; Prabhu G
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(6):957-66. PubMed ID: 15716166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sustained maintenance of somatotopic information in brain regions recruited by tactile working memory.
    Katus T; Müller MM; Eimer M
    J Neurosci; 2015 Jan; 35(4):1390-5. PubMed ID: 25632117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ERP investigation of transient attentional selection of single and multiple locations within touch.
    Forster B; Gillmeister H
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Jun; 48(6):788-96. PubMed ID: 20958307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maintenance of tactile short-term memory for locations is mediated by spatial attention.
    Katus T; Andersen SK; Müller MM
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Jan; 89(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 21925566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lost in vision: ERP correlates of exogenous tactile attention when engaging in a visual task.
    Jones A; Forster B
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Mar; 51(4):675-85. PubMed ID: 23340481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shifts of attention in the early blind: an erp study of attentional control processes in the absence of visual spatial information.
    Van Velzen J; Eardley AF; Forster B; Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2533-46. PubMed ID: 16687156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Independent effects of eye gaze and spatial attention on the processing of tactile events: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Gherri E; Forster B
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Jul; 109():239-47. PubMed ID: 26101088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How microsaccades relate to lateralized ERP components of spatial attention: A co-registration study.
    Meyberg S; Sommer W; Dimigen O
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 May; 99():64-80. PubMed ID: 28254651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Large lateralized EDAN-like brain potentials in a gaze-shift detection task.
    Kirk Driller K; Stephani T; Dimigen O; Sommer W
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Jul; 56(7):e13361. PubMed ID: 30848515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anterior and posterior attentional control systems use different spatial reference frames: ERP evidence from covert tactile-spatial orienting.
    Eimer M; Forster B; Van Velzen J
    Psychophysiology; 2003 Nov; 40(6):924-33. PubMed ID: 14986845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.