These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Abortion rights judgment: a ray of hope! Johari V; Jadhav U Indian J Med Ethics; 2017; 2(3):180-183. PubMed ID: 28279947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conflicting abortion laws in India: Unintended barriers to safe abortion for adolescent girls. Jain D; Tronic B Indian J Med Ethics; 2019; 4 (NS)(4):310-317. PubMed ID: 31791936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The misrepresentation of conscientious objection as a new strategy of resistance to abortion decriminalisation. Undurraga V; Sadler M Sex Reprod Health Matters; 2019 May; 27(2):1610280. PubMed ID: 31533589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights. Reilly EA Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Carhart case and late-term abortions -- what's next in Australia? Faunce T; Jefferys S J Law Med; 2007 Aug; 15(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 17902487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conflicts between protecting and respecting women: the prohibition of sex-selected birth. Dickens BM Hum Health Care Int; 1997; 13(2):14-5. PubMed ID: 16729411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Supreme Court and abortion rights. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2201-7. PubMed ID: 17476003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A critical review of conscientious objection and decriminalisation of abortion in Chile. Montero A; Villarroel R J Med Ethics; 2018 Apr; 44(4):279-283. PubMed ID: 29306873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Addressing challenges related to the professional practice of abortion post-Roe. Chervenak FA; Moreno JD; McLeod-Sordjan R; Bornstein E; Katz A; Pollet SL; Combs A; De Four Jones M; Lewis D; Bachmann G; Gordon MR; Warman A; Grünebaum A Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 May; 230(5):532-539. PubMed ID: 37914062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion, secular dogma, and the sacrament of sex: another failed attempt to impose moral idiosyncrasies through the ruse of argument. Trotter G Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):51-2. PubMed ID: 21161845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Webster versus reproductive health services. Rhodes AM MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1989; 14(6):423. PubMed ID: 2514333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion counselling and the 1995 German abortion law. Funk N Conn J Int Law; 1996; 12(1):33-65. PubMed ID: 16506337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethical arguments for access to abortion services in the Republic of Ireland: recent developments in the public discourse. McCarthy J; O'Donnell K; Campbell L; Dooley D J Med Ethics; 2018 Aug; 44(8):513-517. PubMed ID: 29776978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The abortion right, originalism, and the Fourteenth Amendment. Graines S; Wyatt J Clevel State Law Rev; 1999; 47(2):161-91. PubMed ID: 12715815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]