These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18788078)

  • 1. Reducing racial bias in the penalty phase of capital trials.
    Shaked-Schroer N; Costanzo M; Marcus-Newhall A
    Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(5):603-17. PubMed ID: 18788078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discrimination and instructional comprehension: guided discretion, racial bias, and the death penalty.
    Lynch M; Haney C
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Jun; 24(3):337-58. PubMed ID: 10846376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Capital jury deliberation: effects on death sentencing, comprehension, and discrimination.
    Lynch M; Haney C
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Dec; 33(6):481-96. PubMed ID: 19333746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Arbitrariness and the death penalty: how the defendant's appearance during trial influences capital jurors' punishment decision.
    Antonio ME
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):215-34. PubMed ID: 16557640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of mitigation evidence, ethnicity, and SES on death penalty decisions by European American and Latino venire persons.
    Espinoza RK; Willis-Esqueda C
    Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol; 2015 Apr; 21(2):288-99. PubMed ID: 25150818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Juror Decision-making in Death Penalty Sentencing when Presented with Defendant's History of Child Abuse or Neglect.
    Bell Holleran LL; Vaughan TJ; Vandiver DM
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Nov; 34(6):742-766. PubMed ID: 28098410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Expert testimony in capital sentencing: juror responses.
    Montgomery JH; Ciccone JR; Garvey SP; Eisenberg T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):509-18. PubMed ID: 16394228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of the Psychopathy Checklist--Revised in capital cases: mock jurors' responses to the label of psychopathy.
    Cox J; DeMatteo DS; Foster EE
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(6):878-91. PubMed ID: 20824653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Racial bias in decisions made by mock jurors evaluating a case of sexual harassment.
    Wuensch KL; Campbell MW; Kesler FC; Moore CH
    J Soc Psychol; 2002 Oct; 142(5):587-600. PubMed ID: 12236469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interactive effects of characteristics of defendant and mock juror on U.S. participants' judgment and sentencing recommendations.
    Abwender DA; Hough K
    J Soc Psychol; 2001 Oct; 141(5):603-15. PubMed ID: 11758038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Race and jurors' receptivity to mitigation in capital cases: the effect of jurors', defendants', and victims' race in combination.
    Brewer TW
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Oct; 28(5):529-45. PubMed ID: 15638208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "Race salience" in juror decision-making: misconceptions, clarifications, and unanswered questions.
    Sommers SR; Ellsworth PC
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(4):599-609. PubMed ID: 19513991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Getting to the point: attempting to improve juror comprehension of capital penalty phase instructions.
    Smith AE; Haney C
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Oct; 35(5):339-50. PubMed ID: 20936335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Life or death: A qualitative examination of mitigating and aggravating evidence presented in capital trials.
    Holleran LB
    Behav Sci Law; 2023; 41(6):463-487. PubMed ID: 37823614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Death Penalty Decisions: Instruction Comprehension, Attitudes, and Decision Mediators.
    Patry MW; Penrod SD
    J Forensic Psychol Pract; 2013 Jan; 13(3):204-244. PubMed ID: 24072981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Jurors' cognitive depletion and performance during jury deliberation as a function of jury diversity and defendant race.
    Peter-Hagene L
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Jun; 43(3):232-249. PubMed ID: 31120276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Jurors' locus of control and defendants' attractiveness in death penalty sentencing.
    Beckham CM; Spray BJ; Pietz CA
    J Soc Psychol; 2007 Jun; 147(3):285-98. PubMed ID: 17703790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Possibility of death sentence has divergent effect on verdicts for Black and White defendants.
    Glaser J; Martin KD; Kahn KB
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Dec; 39(6):539-46. PubMed ID: 26146816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of defendant race, victim race, and juror gender on evidence processing in a murder trial.
    Forsterlee R; Forsterlee L; Horowitz IA; King E
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):179-98. PubMed ID: 16557616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nature, nurture, and capital punishment: How evidence of a genetic-environment interaction, future dangerousness, and deliberation affect sentencing decisions.
    Gordon N; Greene E
    Behav Sci Law; 2018 Jan; 36(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 28881042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.