These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18788953)

  • 21. A funding headache.
    Lancet Neurol; 2007 Nov; 6(11):939. PubMed ID: 17945144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Addressing the decline in NIH pain research funding.
    Max MB
    J Pain; 2008 Dec; 9(12):1074-6. PubMed ID: 19038769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Limit the number of grants per person.
    Sachs F
    Nature; 1997 Jul; 388(6639):222. PubMed ID: 9230423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. NIH: grants revamp needs grounding in evidence.
    Hannun YA
    Nature; 2008 Apr; 452(7189):811. PubMed ID: 18421328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Peer review reviewed.
    Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7159):115. PubMed ID: 17851475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. No more third time lucky.
    Ledford H
    Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7215):841. PubMed ID: 18923475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evolution of National Institutes of Health options for rehabilitation research.
    Verville R; DeLisa JA
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Aug; 82(8):565-79. PubMed ID: 12872012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A shot in the arm for clinical research.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1996 Mar; 380(6571):187. PubMed ID: 8637558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. NIH responds to critics on peer review.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7197):835. PubMed ID: 18548033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Temporary reprieve for stem cells.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7313):258-9. PubMed ID: 20844505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Science policy: Well-funded investigators should receive extra scrutiny.
    Berg JM
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):203. PubMed ID: 22972279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Shorter NIH grant form launches.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2010 Jan; 463(7277):12-3. PubMed ID: 20054365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. NIH firm on grant application rules.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2011 Mar; 471(7340):558. PubMed ID: 21455147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. New rules propose greater scrutiny for NIH grant recipients.
    Dove A
    Nat Med; 2006 Jan; 12(1):5. PubMed ID: 16397535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Health spending differentials.
    Marmor T
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2004; 23(6):271; author reply 272-3. PubMed ID: 15537607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Grant scores leave applicants in limbo.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2009 Aug; 460(7256):676. PubMed ID: 19661881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. US cancer institute shifts funds to external research.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1996 Mar; 380(6569):4. PubMed ID: 8598902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. U.S. research funding. Science adviser says that pruning is the key to a healthy budget.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2007 Feb; 315(5814):927. PubMed ID: 17303728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Seed money to bring in pioneers.
    Check E
    Nature; 2007 Mar; 446(7133):238-9. PubMed ID: 17361143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. U.S. research spending. Scientists feel the pain as 2007 budget outlook grows dark.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2006 Dec; 314(5806):1666-7. PubMed ID: 17170258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.