These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18789424)
1. The relationship between surgical factors and margin status after breast-conservation surgery for early stage breast cancer. Lovrics PJ; Cornacchi SD; Farrokhyar F; Garnett A; Chen V; Franic S; Simunovic M Am J Surg; 2009 Jun; 197(6):740-6. PubMed ID: 18789424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer. Smitt MC; Horst K Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1040-4. PubMed ID: 17203329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors associated with residual breast cancer after re-excision for close or positive margins. Cellini C; Hollenbeck ST; Christos P; Martins D; Carson J; Kemper S; Lavigne E; Chan E; Simmons R Ann Surg Oncol; 2004 Oct; 11(10):915-20. PubMed ID: 15383425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Aziz D; Rawlinson E; Narod SA; Sun P; Lickley HL; McCready DR; Holloway CM Breast J; 2006; 12(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16848842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program. Kurniawan ED; Wong MH; Windle I; Rose A; Mou A; Buchanan M; Collins JP; Miller JA; Gruen RL; Mann GB Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):2542-9. PubMed ID: 18618180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Completion mastectomy after breast conserving surgery. O'Donnell ME; Salem A; Badger SA; Sharif MA; Lioe T; Spence RA Breast; 2008 Apr; 17(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 18024117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors predisposing to cavity margin positivity following conservation surgery for breast cancer. Keskek M; Kothari M; Ardehali B; Betambeau N; Nasiri N; Gui GP Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Dec; 30(10):1058-64. PubMed ID: 15522551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MammoSite excision volume as a predictor for residual disease. Kaufman SA; Dipetrillo TA; Ruthazer R; Wazer DE Cancer; 2005 Sep; 104(5):906-12. PubMed ID: 16047330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Waljee JF; Hu ES; Newman LA; Alderman AK Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 May; 15(5):1297-303. PubMed ID: 18259820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery. Huston TL; Pigalarga R; Osborne MP; Tousimis E Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 16978962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient age and positive margins are predictive factors of residual tumor on mastectomy specimen after conservative treatment for breast cancer. Voguet L; Hébert T; Levêque J; Acker O; Mesbah H; Marret H; Porée P; Body G Breast; 2009 Aug; 18(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 19628389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A pathologic assessment of adequate margin status in breast-conserving therapy. Dillon MF; Hill AD; Quinn CM; McDermott EW; O'Higgins N Ann Surg Oncol; 2006 Mar; 13(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 16474911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors that influence the incidence of microscopic carcinoma in frozen and preserved specimens from patients with breast carcinoma after breast-conserving surgery. Kim R; Osaki A; Kaneko M; Inai K; Toge T Oncol Rep; 2003; 10(5):1321-8. PubMed ID: 12883701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors associated with negative margins of lumpectomy specimen: potential use in selecting patients for intraoperative radiotherapy. Schiller DE; Le LW; Cho BC; Youngson BJ; McCready DR Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):833-42. PubMed ID: 18163174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of resection margins in patients treated with breast conservation surgery. Zavagno G; Goldin E; Mencarelli R; Capitanio G; Del Bianco P; Marconato R; Mocellin S; Marconato G; Belardinelli V; Marcon F; Nitti D Cancer; 2008 May; 112(9):1923-31. PubMed ID: 18327818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors affecting successful breast conservation for ductal carcinoma in situ. Dillon MF; Mc Dermott EW; O'Doherty A; Quinn CM; Hill AD; O'Higgins N Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 May; 14(5):1618-28. PubMed ID: 17443388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Importance of routine cavity sampling in breast conservation surgery. Hewes JC; Imkampe A; Haji A; Bates T Br J Surg; 2009 Jan; 96(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 19108003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of margin status on local recurrence after breast conservation and radiation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ. Dunne C; Burke JP; Morrow M; Kell MR J Clin Oncol; 2009 Apr; 27(10):1615-20. PubMed ID: 19255332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identifying patients at risk of compromised margins following breast conservation for lobular carcinoma. Dillon MF; Hill AD; Fleming FJ; O'Doherty A; Quinn CM; McDermott EW; O'Higgins N Am J Surg; 2006 Feb; 191(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 16442946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]