These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

678 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18790205)

  • 1. Six-month clinical outcome of cyclosporine microemulsion formulation (Sigmasporin Microral) in stable renal transplant patients previously maintained on sandimmun neoral.
    Al Wakeel JS; Shaheen FA; Mathew MC; Abou Zeinab HM; Al Alfi A; Tarif NM; Al Mousawi MS; Mahmoud TS; Alorrayed AS; Fagir EA; Dham RS; Shaker DS
    Transplant Proc; 2008 Sep; 40(7):2245-51. PubMed ID: 18790205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cyclosporine microemulsion formulation (sigmasporin microral) effect as first-line immunosuppressant on renal functions at 3 years.
    Al Wakeel J; Shaheen FA; Al Alfi A; Abbas Fagir EH; Iman A; Nampoory MR; Al Mousawi MS; Said T; Abou Zeinab H; Shaker DS; Ghaedi BB
    Transplant Proc; 2012 Jan; 44(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 22310589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Therapeutic equivalence and mg:mg switch ability of a generic cyclosporine microemulsion formulation (Sigmasporin Microral) in stable renal transplant patients maintained on Sandimmun Neoral.
    Al Wakeel JS; Shaheen FA; Mathew MC; Abouzeinab HM; Al Alfi A; Tarif NM; Al Mousawi MS; Mahmoud TS; Alorrayed AS; Fagir EA; Dham RS; Shaker DS
    Transplant Proc; 2008 Sep; 40(7):2252-7. PubMed ID: 18790206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical outcomes during the first three months posttransplant in renal allograft recipients managed by C2 monitoring of cyclosporine microemulsion.
    Thervet E; Pfeffer P; Scolari MP; Toselli L; Pallardó LM; Chadban S; Pilmore H; Connolly J; Buchler M; Schena FP; Carreño CA; Dandavino R; Cole E
    Transplantation; 2003 Sep; 76(6):903-8. PubMed ID: 14508352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 12-month follow-up analysis of a multicenter, randomized, prospective trial in de novo liver transplant recipients (LIS2T) comparing cyclosporine microemulsion (C2 monitoring) and tacrolimus.
    Levy G; Grazi GL; Sanjuan F; Wu Y; Mühlbacher F; Samuel D; Friman S; Jones R; Cantisani G; Villamil F; Cillo U; Clavien PA; Klintmalm G; Otto G; Pollard S; McCormick PA
    Liver Transpl; 2006 Oct; 12(10):1464-72. PubMed ID: 17004259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How to convert from traditional cyclosporine to the microemulsion formulation in stable renal transplant patients?
    Gaspari F; Perico N; Pisoni R; Anedda MF; Signorini O; Caruso R; Gotti E; Remuzzi G
    Clin Transplant; 1998 Oct; 12(5):379-90. PubMed ID: 9787945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolution of the absorption profile of cyclosporine A in renal transplant recipients: a longitudinal study of the de novo and maintenance phases.
    Büchler M; Chadban S; Cole E; Midtvedt K; Thervet E; Prestele H; Keown P
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2006 Jan; 21(1):197-202. PubMed ID: 16204301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cyclosporine dose reduction in stable renal transplant patients with high C2 level: simplified method of single C2 measurement and individualization of C0 target.
    Higgins RM; Kanji H; Hernon M; Harrison P; Lam FT; Kashi SH
    Transpl Int; 2005 Jul; 18(7):806-10. PubMed ID: 15948859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The clinical impact of 1:1 conversion from Neoral to a generic cyclosporine (Gengraf) in renal transplant recipients with stable graft function.
    Qazi YA; Forrest A; Tornatore K; Venuto RC
    Clin Transplant; 2006; 20(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 16824147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term kidney transplant outcomes in patients receiving oil-based or microemulsion formulations of cyclosporine.
    Medina-Pestana JO; Felipe CR; Park SI; Machado PG; Garcia R; Spinelli G; Silva LA; Santos CF; Tedesco-Silva H
    Transplant Proc; 2004 Mar; 36(2 Suppl):74S-79S. PubMed ID: 15041311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pharmacokinetic, hemodynamic, and metabolic effects of cyclosporine sandimmune versus the microemulsion neoral in heart transplant recipients.
    White M; Pelletier GB; Tan A; Jesina C; Carrier M
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 1997 Aug; 16(8):787-94. PubMed ID: 9286770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experience with conversion from Sandimmun to Neoral cyclosporine and the correlation of C2 levels with renal function.
    Konstadinidou I; Boletis JN
    Transplant Proc; 2004 Mar; 36(2 Suppl):163S-166S. PubMed ID: 15041329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-years experience with Neoral C2 monitoring adjusted to a target range of 500-600 ng/ml in long-term renal transplant recipients receiving dual immunosuppressive therapy.
    Carstens J
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2008; 42(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 18432535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conversion to microemulsion cyclosporine in stable renal transplant patients: results after one year.
    Neumayer HH; Budde K; Färber L; Haller P; Kohnen R; Maibücher A; Schuster A; Vollmar J; Waiser J; Luft FC
    Clin Nephrol; 1996 May; 45(5):326-31. PubMed ID: 8738665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of late conversion from C0 to C2 monitoring of microemulsified cyclosporine in pediatric living donor liver transplant recipients.
    Takatsuki M; Chen CL; Chen YS; Wang CC; Lin CC; Yang CH; Yong CC; Liu YW
    Clin Transplant; 2004 Dec; 18(6):694-9. PubMed ID: 15516246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. C2 monitoring of cyclosporine in stable renal transplant patients results in lower costs and improved renal function.
    Domínguez J; Fuenzalida D; Norambuena R; Pais E; Cortes Monroy G; Llanos R
    Transplant Proc; 2005 Apr; 37(3):1583-5. PubMed ID: 15866680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Safe conversion to cicloral, a generic cylosporine, in both stable and de novo renal transplant recipients.
    Kahn D; Muller E; Pascoe M
    Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl; 2010 May; 21(3):426-32. PubMed ID: 20427863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Safety and tolerability of Sandimmun Neoral vs Sandimmun in de novo renal transplant patients after 24 months' treatment. German Neoral Study Group.
    Buchholz B; Korn A
    Transplant Proc; 1996 Aug; 28(4):2187-8. PubMed ID: 8769195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized, controlled trial of C0- Vs C2-guided therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporine in stable heart transplant patients.
    Mathias HC; Ozalp F; Will MB; Borland W; Payne C; Kerr M; Lockhart J; Murday AJ
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2005 Dec; 24(12):2137-43. PubMed ID: 16364862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy and safety of changing from cyclosporine C0 to C2 monitoring in stable recipients following renal transplantation: a prospective cohort study.
    Zhang Y; Zhang XD; Wang Y
    Transplant Proc; 2011 Dec; 43(10):3697-701. PubMed ID: 22172829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.