485 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18790535)
1. Does methodology matter in eyewitness identification research? The effect of live versus video exposure on eyewitness identification accuracy.
Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Panton T
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 18790535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups.
Wright DB
Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates.
Brewer N; Wells GL
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Mar; 12(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16536656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Eyewitness identification accuracy and response latency: the unruly 10-12-second rule.
Weber N; Brewer N; Wells GL; Semmler C; Keast A
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2004 Sep; 10(3):139-47. PubMed ID: 15462616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of postidentification feedback on eyewitness identification and nonidentification confidence.
Semmler C; Brewer N; Wells GL
J Appl Psychol; 2004 Apr; 89(2):334-46. PubMed ID: 15065979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification.
Clark SE
Law Hum Behav; 2005 Aug; 29(4):395-424. PubMed ID: 16133947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of local and global processing orientation on eyewitness identification performance.
Perfect TJ; Dennis I; Snell A
Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):784-98. PubMed ID: 17852730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A problem with double-blind photospread procedures: photospread administrators use one eyewitness's confidence to influence the identification of another eyewitness.
Douglass AB; Smith C; Fraser-Thill R
Law Hum Behav; 2005 Oct; 29(5):543-62. PubMed ID: 16254742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Children's metacognitive judgments in an eyewitness identification task.
Keast A; Brewer N; Wells GL
J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Aug; 97(4):286-314. PubMed ID: 17512942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The mitigating effects of suspicion on post-identification feedback and on retrospective eyewitness memory.
Neuschatz JS; Lawson DS; Fairless AH; Powers RA; Neuschatz JS; Goodsell CA; Toglia MP
Law Hum Behav; 2007 Jun; 31(3):231-47. PubMed ID: 17253155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to assess eyewitness accuracy and deception.
Lefebvre CD; Marchand Y; Smith SM; Connolly JF
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 19303425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sequential lineup laps and eyewitness accuracy.
Steblay NK; Dietrich HL; Ryan SL; Raczynski JL; James KA
Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):262-74. PubMed ID: 20632113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cueing confidence in eyewitness identifications: influence of biased lineup instructions and pre-identification memory feedback under varying lineup conditions.
Leippe MR; Eisenstadt D; Rauch SM
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):194-212. PubMed ID: 18600436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Children's identification of faces from lineups: the effects of lineup presentation and instructions on accuracy.
Beresford J; Blades M
J Appl Psychol; 2006 Sep; 91(5):1102-13. PubMed ID: 16953771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification.
Clark SE
Law Hum Behav; 2005 Oct; 29(5):575-604. PubMed ID: 16254744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Criminal identification comparison: aural versus visual identifications resulting from a simulated crime.
Hollien H; Bennett G; Gelfer MP
J Forensic Sci; 1983 Jan; 28(1):208-21. PubMed ID: 6680738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: the effects of reflection and disconfirmation on correlation and calibration.
Brewer N; Keast A; Rishworth A
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2002 Mar; 8(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 12009176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Eyewitness lineups: is the appearance-change instruction a good idea?
Charman SD; Wells GL
Law Hum Behav; 2007 Feb; 31(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 16612580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lineup administrator influences on eyewitness identification decisions.
Clark SE; Marshall TE; Rosenthal R
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 19309217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Regularities in eyewitness identification.
Clark SE; Howell RT; Davey SL
Law Hum Behav; 2008 Jun; 32(3):187-218. PubMed ID: 17410411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
