These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

470 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18790535)

  • 41. Postidentification feedback affects subsequent eyewitness identification performance.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Dec; 16(4):387-98. PubMed ID: 21198255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Eyewitness identification accuracy: a comparison of adults with and those without intellectual disabilities.
    Ericson K; Isaacs B
    Ment Retard; 2003 Jun; 41(3):161-73. PubMed ID: 12737610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Eyewitness identification accuracy and response latency.
    Brewer N; Caon A; Todd C; Weber N
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Feb; 30(1):31-50. PubMed ID: 16729207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Predictors of eyewitness identification decisions from video lineups in England: a field study.
    Horry R; Memon A; Wright DB; Milne R
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Aug; 36(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 22849411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. How variations in distance affect eyewitness reports and identification accuracy.
    Lindsay RC; Semmler C; Weber N; Brewer N; Lindsay MR
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Dec; 32(6):526-35. PubMed ID: 18253819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The Relationship Between Eyewitness Confidence and Identification Accuracy: A New Synthesis.
    Wixted JT; Wells GL
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2017 May; 18(1):10-65. PubMed ID: 28395650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Configural and component processing in simultaneous and sequential lineup procedures.
    Flowe HD; Smith HM; Karoğlu N; Onwuegbusi TO; Rai L
    Memory; 2016; 24(3):306-14. PubMed ID: 25665039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. What we know now: the Evanston Illinois field lineups.
    Steblay NK
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Feb; 35(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 20177754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Confidence-accuracy calibration in absolute and relative face recognition judgments.
    Weber N; Brewer N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2004 Sep; 10(3):156-72. PubMed ID: 15462618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Postidentification feedback affects real eyewitnesses.
    Wright DB; Skagerberg EM
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Feb; 18(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 17425539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Do masked-face lineups facilitate eyewitness identification of a masked individual?
    Manley KD; Chan JCK; Wells GL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Sep; 25(3):396-409. PubMed ID: 30556719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Identifying the bad guy in a lineup using confidence judgments under deadline pressure.
    Brewer N; Weber N; Wootton D; Lindsay DS
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1208-14. PubMed ID: 22933457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparing witness performance in the field versus the lab: How real-world conditions affect eyewitness decision-making.
    Eisen ML; Ying RC; Chui C; Swaby MA
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Jun; 46(3):175-188. PubMed ID: 35604705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Phenomenological reports diagnose accuracy of eyewitness identification decisions.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; McKinnon AC; Weber N
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Feb; 133(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 19954764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effect of lineup member similarity on recognition accuracy in simultaneous and sequential lineups.
    Flowe HD; Ebbesen EB
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Feb; 31(1):33-52. PubMed ID: 17123159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory.
    Deffenbacher KA; Bornstein BH; Penrod SD; McGorty EK
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Dec; 28(6):687-706. PubMed ID: 15732653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Can eyewitnesses correct for external influences on their lineup identifications? The actual/counterfactual assessment paradigm.
    Charman SD; Wells GL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 18377163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of administrator-witness contact on eyewitness identification accuracy.
    Haw RM; Fisher RP
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Dec; 89(6):1106-12. PubMed ID: 15584846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of eyewitness memory: comparing the diagnostic accuracy of simultaneous versus sequential lineups.
    Mickes L; Flowe HD; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):361-76. PubMed ID: 23294282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Postdictors of eyewitness errors: can false identifications be diagnosed?
    Smith SM; Lindsay RC; Pryke S
    J Appl Psychol; 2000 Aug; 85(4):542-50. PubMed ID: 10948799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.