These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18792509)

  • 1. On-the-fly adaptation of selectivity in the flanker task.
    Lehle C; Hübner R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Aug; 15(4):814-8. PubMed ID: 18792509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interactions between color and word processing in a flanker task.
    Henik A; Ro T; Merrill D; Rafal R; Safadi Z
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Feb; 25(1):198-209. PubMed ID: 10069032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Location-specific versus hemisphere-specific adaptation of processing selectivity.
    Wendt M; Kluwe RH; Vietze I
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):135-40. PubMed ID: 18605493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of acute exercise on cognitive control required during an Eriksen flanker task.
    Davranche K; Hall B; McMorris T
    J Sport Exerc Psychol; 2009 Oct; 31(5):628-39. PubMed ID: 20016112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contextual control of stimulus generalization and stimulus equivalence in hierarchical categorization.
    Griffee K; Dougher MJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Nov; 78(3):433-47. PubMed ID: 12507013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strategies of flanker coprocessing in single and dual tasks.
    Hübner R; Lehle C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):103-23. PubMed ID: 17311482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semantic processing of crowded stimuli?
    Huckauf A; Knops A; Nuerk HC; Willmes K
    Psychol Res; 2008 Nov; 72(6):648-56. PubMed ID: 18841386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Flanker task with equiprobable congruent and incongruent conditions does not elicit the conflict N2.
    Kałamała P; Szewczyk J; Senderecka M; Wodniecka Z
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Feb; 55(2):. PubMed ID: 28845513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enhancement of perceptual representations by endogenous attention biases competition in response selection.
    Klemen J; Verbruggen F; Skelton C; Chambers CD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2514-27. PubMed ID: 21826553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flanker and Simon effects interact at the response selection stage.
    Treccani B; Cubelli R; Della Sala S; Umilta C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009; 62(9):1784-804. PubMed ID: 19180364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Of colored numbers and numbered colors: interactive processes in grapheme-color synesthesia.
    Gebuis T; Nijboer TC; van der Smagt MJ
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(3):180-7. PubMed ID: 19289360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Oddball distractors demand attention: neural and behavioral responses to predictability in the flanker task.
    Noyce A; Sekuler R
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Dec; 65():18-24. PubMed ID: 25447061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict.
    Lamers MJ; Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1056-81. PubMed ID: 21113864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Context specificity of conflict frequency-dependent control.
    Vietze I; Wendt M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1391-400. PubMed ID: 19048452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flanker tasks based on congruency manipulation are biased measures of selective attention in perceptual load studies.
    Li Z; Lou J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1836-1845. PubMed ID: 30993656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Role of practice and stimulus-onset-asynchrony in modulating effects of stimulus repetition, category relation, and response compatibility in the Eriksen flanker task.
    Zhang H
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Jun; 84(3 Pt 1):1087-96. PubMed ID: 9172226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The multifaceted nature of unsupervised category learning.
    Love BC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):190-7. PubMed ID: 12747507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sequential dependencies in the Eriksen flanker task: a direct comparison of two competing accounts.
    Davelaar EJ; Stevens J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 19145021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional processing of "unattended" flankers: evidence for a failure of selective attention.
    Schmidt PA; Dark VJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Feb; 60(2):227-38. PubMed ID: 9529907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning through instructions vs. learning through practice: flanker congruency effects from instructed and applied S-R mappings.
    Wenke D; De Houwer J; De Winne J; Liefooghe B
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):899-912. PubMed ID: 26511962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.