These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18792510)

  • 1. Why does the effect of short-SOA exogenous cuing on simple RT depend on the number of display locations?
    Mordkoff JT; Halterman R; Chen P
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Aug; 15(4):819-24. PubMed ID: 18792510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the spatial metric of short-SOA costs of exogenous cuing.
    Chen P; Moore C; Mordkoff JT
    Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(2):229-40. PubMed ID: 18510134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Facilitation and inhibition arising from the exogenous orienting of covert attention depends on the temporal properties of spatial cues and targets.
    Maruff P; Yucel M; Danckert J; Stuart G; Currie J
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(6):731-44. PubMed ID: 10390035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An apparent-motion confound causes the negative exogenous cuing effect at SOAs with larger numbers of target locations.
    Chen P; Mordkoff JT
    Am J Psychol; 2012; 125(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 22428426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Objects and their locations in exogenous cuing.
    Schendel KL; Robertson LC; Treisman A
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 May; 63(4):577-94. PubMed ID: 11436731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inhibition of return and attentional control settings.
    Gibson BS; Amelio J
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Apr; 62(3):496-504. PubMed ID: 10909240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Orienting in space and time: joint contributions to exogenous spatial cuing effects.
    Milliken B; Lupiáñez J; Roberts M; Stevanovski B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Dec; 10(4):877-83. PubMed ID: 15000534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of alcohol on exogenous precueing of attention.
    Post RB; Chaderjian MR; Maddock RJ
    J Stud Alcohol; 2000 Mar; 61(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 10757133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the spatial specificity of audiovisual crossmodal exogenous cuing effects.
    Lee J; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jun; 177():78-88. PubMed ID: 28477457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do peripheral non-informative cues induce early facilitation of target detection?
    Tassinari G; Aglioti S; Chelazzi L; Peru A; Berlucchi G
    Vision Res; 1994 Jan; 34(2):179-89. PubMed ID: 8116277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examining the time course of facilitation and inhibition with simultaneous onset and offset cues.
    Pratt J; Hirshhorn M
    Psychol Res; 2003 Nov; 67(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 14634813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disentangling perceptual and motor components in inhibition of return.
    Zhou B
    Cogn Process; 2008 Aug; 9(3):175-87. PubMed ID: 18327623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The spatial distribution of attention following an exogenous cue.
    Henderson JM; Macquistan AD
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Feb; 53(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 8433920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial attention triggered by unimodal, crossmodal, and bimodal exogenous cues: a comparison of reflexive orienting mechanisms.
    Santangelo V; Van der Lubbe RH; Belardinelli MO; Postma A
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 173(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 16489435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Involuntary attentional shifts due to orientation differences.
    Joseph JS; Optican LM
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Jul; 58(5):651-65. PubMed ID: 8710445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the uniqueness of attentional capture by uninformative gaze cues: facilitation interacts with the Simon effect and is rarely followed by IOR.
    McKee D; Christie J; Klein R
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):293-303. PubMed ID: 18266505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inhibition of return for the length of a line?
    Francis L; Milliken B
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1208-21. PubMed ID: 14710956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus discrimination following covert attentional orienting to an exogenous cue.
    Henderson JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 1826325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Movement versus focusing of visual attention.
    Shepherd M; Müller HJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Aug; 46(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 2762102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Large and rapid improvement in form discrimination accuracy following a location precue.
    Lyon DR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Feb; 73(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 2316388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.