These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18792510)
21. Task switching versus cue switching: using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching performance. Schneider DW; Logan GD J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):370-8. PubMed ID: 17352618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Modulating the attentional bias in unilateral neglect: the effects of the strategic set. Bartolomeo P; Siéroff E; Decaix C; Chokron S Exp Brain Res; 2001 Apr; 137(3-4):432-44. PubMed ID: 11355388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Is object-based attention mandatory? Strategic control over mode of attention. Yeari M; Goldsmith M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):565-579. PubMed ID: 20515189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Influence of display type and cue format on task-cuing effects: dissociating switch cost and right-left prevalence effects. Proctor RW; Koch I; Vu KP; Yamaguchi M Mem Cognit; 2008 Jul; 36(5):998-1012. PubMed ID: 18630206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Inhibition of return in manual and saccadic response systems. Briand KA; Larrison AL; Sereno AB Percept Psychophys; 2000 Nov; 62(8):1512-24. PubMed ID: 11140175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Contextual cuing by global features. Kunar MA; Flusberg SJ; Wolfe JM Percept Psychophys; 2006 Oct; 68(7):1204-16. PubMed ID: 17355043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Inhibition of return lasts longer at repeatedly stimulated locations than at novel locations. Chao HF; Yeh YY Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):896-901. PubMed ID: 17328392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. RT Slowing to Valid Cues on a Reflexive Attention Task in Children and Young Adults. Lundwall RA; Woodruff J; Tolboe SP Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1324. PubMed ID: 30127758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Rapid learning of rapid temporal contexts. Mayberry CR; Livesey EJ; Dux PE Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Jun; 17(3):417-20. PubMed ID: 20551368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Emergent perceptual features in the benefit of consistent stimulus-response mappings on dual-task performance. Vu KP; Proctor RW Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):468-83. PubMed ID: 16215745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Visuospatial attention is guided by both the symbolic value and the spatial proximity of selected arrows. Pratt J; Radulescu P; Guo RM; Hommel B J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1321-4. PubMed ID: 20873941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: distinct attentional mechanisms. Pashler H J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Nov; 17(4):1023-40. PubMed ID: 1837295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel. Reimer CB; Schubert T Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Behavioral and computational models of spatial attention. Shimp CP; Friedrich FJ J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1993 Jan; 19(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 8418214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]