BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18792538)

  • 1. The expanding purview: institutional review boards and the review of human subjects research.
    Borenstein J
    Account Res; 2008; 15(3):188-204. PubMed ID: 18792538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Common (mis)perceptions about IRB review of human subjects research.
    Lynn MR; Nelson DK
    Nurs Sci Q; 2005 Jul; 18(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 15976051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Informed consent for research on stored blood and tissue samples: a survey of institutional review board practices.
    White MT; Gamm J
    Account Res; 2002; 9(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 12705242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Federal commissions and local IRBs.
    Yesley MS
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Oct; 13(5):11-2. PubMed ID: 6643032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A study of warning letters issued to institutional review boards by the United States Food and Drug Administration.
    Bramstedt KA; Kassimatis K
    Clin Invest Med; 2004 Dec; 27(6):316-23. PubMed ID: 15675112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conflicting interests, social justice and proxy consent to research.
    Pullman D
    J Med Philos; 2002 Oct; 27(5):523-45. PubMed ID: 12461709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The ins and outs of independent IRBs.
    Lis JM; Murray MG
    J Health Life Sci Law; 2008 Oct; 2(1):73, 75-122. PubMed ID: 19004298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Should society allow research ethics boards to be run as for-profit enterprises?
    Emanuel EJ; Lemmens T; Elliot C
    PLoS Med; 2006 Jul; 3(7):e309. PubMed ID: 16848618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A plea for pragmatism in clinical research ethics.
    Brendel DH; Miller FG
    Am J Bioeth; 2008 Apr; 8(4):24-31. PubMed ID: 18576248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The institutional review board and beyond: future challenges to the ethics of human experimentation.
    Edgar H; Rothman DJ
    Milbank Q; 1995; 73(4):489-506. PubMed ID: 7491097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exception from informed consent: viewpoint of institutional review boards--balancing risks to subjects, community consultation, and future directions.
    Ernst AA; Fish S
    Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Nov; 12(11):1050-5. PubMed ID: 16264073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. University admits research proceeded without review by an institutional review board (IRB).
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2003 Apr; 18(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 14603944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conducting industrial and organizational psychological research: institutional review of research in work organizations.
    Ilgen DR; Bell BS
    Ethics Behav; 2001; 11(4):395-412. PubMed ID: 11838504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Ethics of medical scientific research: informed consent and the therapeutic misconception].
    de Vries MC; van Leeuwen E
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Mar; 152(12):679-83. PubMed ID: 18438063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhancing communication among data monitoring committees and institutional review boards.
    Taylor HA; Chaisson L; Sugarman J
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 18559418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The purpose, composition, and function of an institutional review board: balancing priorities.
    Enfield KB; Truwit JD
    Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1330-6. PubMed ID: 18811996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of the institutional review board in the oversight of the ethical aspects of human studies research.
    Cseko GC; Tremaine WJ
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2013 Apr; 28(2):177-81. PubMed ID: 23447409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Institutional review boards as an instrument of assessment: research involving human subjects in the U.S.
    Gray BH
    Sci Technol Human Values; 1978; (25):. PubMed ID: 11663042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Faculty guide to the institutional review board process.
    Kaktins NM
    Nurse Educ; 2009; 34(6):244-8. PubMed ID: 19901736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protecting human subjects: how much responsibility falls to editorial boards?
    Wegman DH; Major E
    Am J Ind Med; 2009 Feb; 52(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 19016264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.