169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1879271)
1. Sampling accuracy of the modified Ayre spatula/Zelsmyr Cytobrush versus the modified Ayre spatula/bulb aspirator in the collection of cells from the uterine cervix.
Selvaggi SM; Malviya V
Diagn Cytopathol; 1991; 7(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 1879271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical follow-up of cervical sampling with the Ayre spatula and Zelsmyr cytobrush.
Crouse BJ; Elliott BA; Nesin N
Arch Fam Med; 1993 Feb; 2(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 8275183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Cytobrush effect on Pap smear adequacy.
Davey-Sullivan B; Gearhart J; Evers CG; Cason Z; Replogle WH
Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Mar; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 2028815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Cell-Sweep. A new cervical cytology sampling device.
Tyau L; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Edmonds P
J Reprod Med; 1994 Nov; 39(11):899-902. PubMed ID: 7853282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
Szarewski A; Cuzick J; Singer A
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endocervical detection of CIN. Cytobrush versus cotton.
Schettino F; Sideri M; Cangini L; Candiani M; Zannoni E; Maggi R; Ferrari A
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1993; 14(3):234-6. PubMed ID: 8508881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Papanicolaou smear adequacy: the cervical cytobrush and Ayre spatula compared with the extended-tip spatula.
Noel ML
J Am Board Fam Pract; 1989; 2(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 2665423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
Fokke HE; Salvatore CM; Schipper ME; Bleker OP
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1993 Feb; 48(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 8491328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical cytology with the Papette sampler.
Ferenczy A; Robitaille J; Guralnick M; Shatz R
J Reprod Med; 1994 Apr; 39(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 8040849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatula/cytobrush vs. spatula/cotton swab detection of cervical condylomatous lesions.
Selvaggi SM
J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):629-33. PubMed ID: 2810246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
Rammou-Kinia R; Anagnostopoulou I; Gomousa M
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush.
Chalvardjian A; De Marchi WG; Bell V; Nishikawa R
CMAJ; 1991 Feb; 144(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1989710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized comparison of the 3 Papanicolaou smear collection methods.
Kavak ZN; Eren F; Pekin S; Küllü S
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Nov; 35(4):446-9. PubMed ID: 8717577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervex-Brush and Cytobrush. Comparison of their ability to sample abnormal cells for cervical smears.
Hutchinson M; Fertitta L; Goldbaum B; Hamza M; Vanerian S; Isenstein L
J Reprod Med; 1991 Aug; 36(8):581-6. PubMed ID: 1941800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contribution of the cytobrush to determining cellular composition of cervical smears.
Doornewaard H; van der Graaf Y
J Clin Pathol; 1990 May; 43(5):393-6. PubMed ID: 2370307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effectiveness and safety of two cervical cytologic techniques during pregnancy.
Stillson T; Knight AL; Elswick RK
J Fam Pract; 1997 Aug; 45(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 9267375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exact Touch: a new device for cervical cytology. Comparison with Ayre spatula plus Cytobrush.
de Palo G; Stefanon B; Alasio L; Pilotti S
Cytopathology; 2000 Oct; 11(5):322-5. PubMed ID: 11014659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Should the Cytobrush be used in routine screening for cervical pathology?
van Erp EJ; Dersjant-Roorda MC; Arentz NP; Stijnen T; Trimbos JB
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1989 Oct; 30(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 2572484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of the methods of cytobrush and Ayre spatula in the concentration of endocervical cells].
Longatto Filho A; Maeda MY; Santos DR; de Andréa Filho A; Cavaliere MJ; Shih LW; Oyafuso MS
Rev Paul Med; 1991; 109(3):93-6. PubMed ID: 1947611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Safety, efficacy and cost of three cervical cytology sampling devices in a prenatal clinic.
Smith-Levitin M; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):749-53. PubMed ID: 8913977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
