250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18792716)
21. Effects of isolation by color on mentally retarded and nonretarded persons' recall of printed words.
Winters JJ; Hoats DL
Am J Ment Defic; 1984 Nov; 89(3):310-2. PubMed ID: 6517115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Influence of recall procedures on the modality effect with numbers and enumerated stimuli.
Gibbons JA; Velkey AK; Partin KT
J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jan; 135(1):84-104. PubMed ID: 18318410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Abstractionist versus exemplar-based theories of visual word priming: a subsystems resolution.
Marsolek C
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1233-59. PubMed ID: 15513245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Multiple roles for time in short-term memory: evidence from serial recall of order and timing.
Farrell S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):128-45. PubMed ID: 18194059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of multimodal stimulus presentation on recall.
Kobus DA; Moses JD; Bloom FA
Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Feb; 78(1):320-2. PubMed ID: 8177681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Attention, gaze shifting, and dual-task interference from phonological encoding in spoken word planning.
Roelofs A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1580-98. PubMed ID: 19045994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Adult age differences in distinctive processing: the modality effect on false recall.
Smith RE; Lozito JP; Bayen UJ
Psychol Aging; 2005 Sep; 20(3):486-92. PubMed ID: 16248707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: evidence for metacognitive illusions.
Rhodes MG; Castel AD
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):615-25. PubMed ID: 18999356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dynamics of the attentional control of word retrieval: analyses of response time distributions.
Roelofs A
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 May; 137(2):303-23. PubMed ID: 18473661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Are spatial responses to visuospatial stimuli and spoken responses to auditory letters ideomotor-compatible tasks? Examination of set-size effects on dual-task interference.
Shin YK; Proctor RW
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 18845280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The picture superiority effect: support for the distinctiveness model.
Mintzer MZ; Snodgrass JG
Am J Psychol; 1999; 112(1):113-46. PubMed ID: 10696280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effects of environmental context on recognition memory and claims of remembering.
Hockley WE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1412-29. PubMed ID: 18980405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Attention and implicit memory in the category-verification and lexical decision tasks.
Mulligan NW; Peterson D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):662-79. PubMed ID: 18444763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Situation models and retrieval interference: pictures and words.
Radvansky GA; Copeland DE
Memory; 2006 Jul; 14(5):614-23. PubMed ID: 16754245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Extended recency effect extended: blocking, presentation mode, and retention interval.
Glidden LM; Pawelski C; Mar H; Zigman W
Am J Ment Defic; 1979 Jul; 84(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 484609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reading aloud: spelling-sound translation uses central attention.
O'Malley S; Reynolds MG; Stolz JA; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):422-9. PubMed ID: 18315417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Inattentional blindness for ignored words: comparison of explicit and implicit memory tasks.
Butler BC; Klein R
Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):811-9. PubMed ID: 19328012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Features versus redundancy: comments on Massaro, Venezky, and Taylor's "Orthographic regularity, positional frequency, and visual processing of letter strings".
Krueger LE
J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Mar; 108(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 528896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Are written and spoken recall of text equivalent?
Kellogg RT
Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(3):415-28. PubMed ID: 17892086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Are phonological representations of printed and spoken language isomorphic? Evidence from the restrictions on unattested onsets.
Berent I
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Oct; 34(5):1288-304. PubMed ID: 18823212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
