These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18793213)

  • 21. Estimating adjusted risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT) measures in the Cox regression model.
    Laubender RP; Bender R
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):851-9. PubMed ID: 20213710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Obtaining adjusted prevalence ratios from logistic regression models in cross-sectional studies.
    Bastos LS; Oliveira Rde V; Velasque Lde S
    Cad Saude Publica; 2015 Mar; 31(3):487-95. PubMed ID: 25859716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Different methods to calculate effect estimates in cross-sectional studies. A comparison between prevalence odds ratio and prevalence ratio.
    Behrens T; Taeger D; Wellmann J; Keil U
    Methods Inf Med; 2004; 43(5):505-9. PubMed ID: 15702210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Privacy-protecting estimation of adjusted risk ratios using modified Poisson regression in multi-center studies.
    Shu D; Young JG; Toh S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):228. PubMed ID: 31805872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Odds Ratio: review about the meaning of an epidemiological measure].
    Aguiar P; Nunes B
    Acta Med Port; 2013; 26(5):505-10. PubMed ID: 24192088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimating model-adjusted risks, risk differences, and risk ratios from complex survey data.
    Bieler GS; Brown GG; Williams RL; Brogan DJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 171(5):618-23. PubMed ID: 20133516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Odds Ratio or Prevalence Ratio? An Overview of Reported Statistical Methods and Appropriateness of Interpretations in Cross-sectional Studies with Dichotomous Outcomes in Veterinary Medicine.
    Martinez BAF; Leotti VB; Silva GSE; Nunes LN; Machado G; Corbellini LG
    Front Vet Sci; 2017; 4():193. PubMed ID: 29177157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Estimating the incidence rate ratio in cross-sectional studies using a simple alternative to logistic regression.
    Martuzzi M; Elliott P
    Ann Epidemiol; 1998 Jan; 8(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 9465994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. What's the relative risk? A method to directly estimate risk ratios in cohort studies of common outcomes.
    Robbins AS; Chao SY; Fonseca VP
    Ann Epidemiol; 2002 Oct; 12(7):452-4. PubMed ID: 12377421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Relative Measures of Association for Binary Outcomes: Challenges and Recommendations for the Global Health Researcher.
    Gallis JA; Turner EL
    Ann Glob Health; 2019 Nov; 85(1):137. PubMed ID: 31807416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
    Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of risks by predicting counterfactuals.
    Zou GY
    Stat Med; 2009 Dec; 28(30):3761-81. PubMed ID: 19856279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impact of the 1990 Hong Kong legislation for restriction on sulfur content in fuel.
    Wong CM; Rabl A; Thach TQ; Chau YK; Chan KP; Cowling BJ; Lai HK; Lam TH; McGhee SM; Anderson HR; Hedley AJ
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 Aug; (170):5-91. PubMed ID: 23316618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bias of using odds ratio estimates in multinomial logistic regressions to estimate relative risk or prevalence ratio and alternatives.
    Camey SA; Torman VB; Hirakata VN; Cortes RX; Vigo A
    Cad Saude Publica; 2014 Jan; 30(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 24627010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes.
    McNutt LA; Wu C; Xue X; Hafner JP
    Am J Epidemiol; 2003 May; 157(10):940-3. PubMed ID: 12746247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prevalence proportion ratios: estimation and hypothesis testing.
    Skov T; Deddens J; Petersen MR; Endahl L
    Int J Epidemiol; 1998 Feb; 27(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 9563700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The relationship between statistical power and predictor distribution in multilevel logistic regression: a simulation-based approach.
    Olvera Astivia OL; Gadermann A; Guhn M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 May; 19(1):97. PubMed ID: 31072299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Using log-binomial model for estimating the prevalence ratio].
    Ye R; Gao YH; Yang Y; Chen Y
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2010 May; 31(5):576-8. PubMed ID: 21163041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Logistic regression vs other generalized linear models to estimate prevalence rate ratios].
    Traissac P; Martin-Prével Y; Delpeuch F; Maire B
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1999 Dec; 47(6):593-604. PubMed ID: 10673593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.