199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18793424)
1. Interference screw vs. suture anchor fixation for open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: does it matter?
Millett PJ; Sanders B; Gobezie R; Braun S; Warner JJ
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2008 Sep; 9():121. PubMed ID: 18793424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: dual suture anchor versus interference screw fixation.
Tashjian RZ; Henninger HB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Oct; 22(10):1408-12. PubMed ID: 23415819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical evaluation of open suture anchor fixation versus interference screw for biceps tenodesis.
Papp DF; Skelley NW; Sutter EG; Ji JH; Wierks CH; Belkoff SM; McFarland EG
Orthopedics; 2011 Jul; 34(7):e275-8. PubMed ID: 21717988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical and sonographic evaluation of subpectoral biceps tenodesis with a dual suture anchor technique demonstrates improved outcomes and a low failure rate at a minimum 2-year follow-up.
Jacxsens M; Granger EK; Tashjian RZ
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2018 Jan; 138(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 29038845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the Interference Screw and Suture Anchor Techniques for Biceps Tenodesis.
Park JS; Kim SH; Jung HJ; Lee YH; Oh JH
Am J Sports Med; 2017 Feb; 45(2):440-448. PubMed ID: 28146397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Immediate physical therapy without postoperative restrictions following open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: low failure rates and improved outcomes at a minimum 2-year follow-up.
Liechti DJ; Mitchell JJ; Menge TJ; Hackett TR
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Oct; 27(10):1891-1897. PubMed ID: 29804912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Transtendinous All-Suture Anchor Technique Versus Interference Screw Technique for Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis in a Cadaveric Model.
Hong CK; Hsu KL; Kuan FC; Lin CL; Yeh ML; Su WR
Arthroscopy; 2018 Jun; 34(6):1755-1761. PubMed ID: 29482858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using Interconnected Knotless Anchor for Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis Could Offer Improved Biomechanical Properties in a Cadaveric Model.
Kuan FC; Hsu KL; Yen JZ; Wen MJ; Yeh ML; Chen Y; Su WR
Arthroscopy; 2020 Aug; 36(8):2047-2054. PubMed ID: 32259645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical Analysis of All-Suture Suture Anchor Fixation Compared With Conventional Suture Anchors and Interference Screws for Biceps Tenodesis.
Frank RM; Bernardoni ED; Veera SS; Waterman BR; Griffin JW; Shewman EF; Cole BJ; Romeo AA; Verma NN
Arthroscopy; 2019 Jun; 35(6):1760-1768. PubMed ID: 31072716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis provided earlier shoulder function restoration compared with open subpectoral biceps tenodesis during the recovery phase.
Ahn J; Kim JH; Shin SJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Mar; 33(3):678-685. PubMed ID: 37572747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. All-arthroscopic suprapectoral versus open subpectoral tenodesis of the long head of the biceps brachii.
Gombera MM; Kahlenberg CA; Nair R; Saltzman MD; Terry MA
Am J Sports Med; 2015 May; 43(5):1077-83. PubMed ID: 25817189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical outcomes after subpectoral biceps tenodesis with an interference screw.
Mazzocca AD; Cote MP; Arciero CL; Romeo AA; Arciero RA
Am J Sports Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):1922-9. PubMed ID: 18697951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Radiostereometric Analysis of Tendon Migration After Arthroscopic and Mini-Open Biceps Tenodesis: Interference Screw Versus Single Suture Anchor Fixation.
Forsythe B; Patel HH; Berlinberg EJ; Forlenza EM; Okoroha KR; Williams BT; Yanke AB; Cole BJ; Verma NN
Am J Sports Med; 2023 Sep; 51(11):2869-2880. PubMed ID: 37548005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. All-Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Versus Open Subpectoral Tenodesis of the Long Head of the Biceps Brachii Without the Use of Interference Screws.
Green JM; Getelman MH; Snyder SJ; Burns JP
Arthroscopy; 2017 Jan; 33(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 27659242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical Comparison of All-Suture Anchor Fixation and Interference Screw Technique for Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis.
Chiang FL; Hong CK; Chang CH; Lin CL; Jou IM; Su WR
Arthroscopy; 2016 Jul; 32(7):1247-52. PubMed ID: 27039966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and radiologic results of arthroscopic biceps tenodesis with suture anchor in the setting of rotator cuff tear.
Lee HI; Shon MS; Koh KH; Lim TK; Heo J; Yoo JC
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2014 Mar; 23(3):e53-60. PubMed ID: 24021158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Biceps Tenodesis Fixation Strengths: Fixation Type and Location Are Biomechanically Equivalent.
Dekker TJ; Peebles LA; Preuss FR; Goldenberg BT; Dornan GJ; Provencher MT
Arthroscopy; 2020 Dec; 36(12):3081-3091. PubMed ID: 32619605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Double on-lay fixation using all suture-type anchor for subpectoral biceps tenodesis has favorable functional outcomes and leads to less cosmetic deformities than single on-lay fixation.
Rhee SM; Jeong HY; Ro K; Pancholi S; Rhee YG
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Dec; 27(12):4005-4013. PubMed ID: 31410527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Suprapectoral biceps tenodesis: a biomechanical comparison of a new "soft anchor" tenodesis technique versus interference screw biceps tendon fixation.
Baleani M; Francesconi D; Zani L; Giannini S; Snyder SJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Feb; 30(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 25533271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis of the Shoulder: Indications and Technique Options.
Nuelle CW; Sheean A; Tucker CJ
Arthroscopy; 2020 Sep; 36(9):2352-2353. PubMed ID: 32325099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
