These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18793706)
1. Fewer peak trials per session facilitate acquisition of peak responding despite elimination of response rate differences. Kaiser DH Behav Processes; 2009 Jan; 80(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 18793706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of an intruded event on peak-interval timing in rats: isolation of a postcue effect. Brown BL; Richer P; Doyère V Behav Processes; 2007 Mar; 74(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 17161921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of spontaneously hypertensive rats in a peak-interval procedure with gaps. Orduña V; García A; Menez M; Hong E; Bouzas A Behav Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 191(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 18436313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of timing and classical conditioning. Holder MD; Roberts S J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1985 Apr; 11(2):172-93. PubMed ID: 4009120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The proportion of fixed interval trials to probe trials affects acquisition of the peak procedure fixed interval timing task. Kaiser DH Behav Processes; 2008 Jan; 77(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 17689204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of intruded events on peak time: the role of reinforcement history during the intruded event. Aum S; Brown BL; Hemmes NS Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 17157998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Human performance on a two-alternative rapid-acquisition choice task. Lie C; Harper DN; Hunt M Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 19015013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Serial conditional discrimination and temporal bisection in rats selectively lesioned in the dentate gyrus. Bueno JL; Bueno Júnior LS Behav Processes; 2011 Mar; 86(3):345-58. PubMed ID: 21335071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Temporal generalization accounts for response resurgence in the peak procedure. Sanabria F; Killeen PR Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):126-41. PubMed ID: 17141981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differences between simultaneous and blocked training detected by a transfer test. Caetano MS; Guilhardi P; Church RM Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 17403584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence for separate neural mechanisms for the timing of discrete and sustained responses. Gooch CM; Wiener M; Portugal GS; Matell MS Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 1156():139-51. PubMed ID: 17506998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Learning to stop or reset the internal clock. Orduña V; Bouzas A Behav Processes; 2011 Nov; 88(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 21907270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigations of timing during the schedule and reinforcement intervals with wheel-running reinforcement. Belke TW; Christie-Fougere MM Behav Processes; 2006 Nov; 73(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 16844324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]