These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18793865)

  • 1. Reliability and validity of a palpation technique for identifying the spinous processes of C7 and L5.
    Robinson R; Robinson HS; Bjørke G; Kvale A
    Man Ther; 2009 Aug; 14(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 18793865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Palpation identification of spinous processes in the lumbar spine.
    Harlick JC; Milosavljevic S; Milburn PD
    Man Ther; 2007 Feb; 12(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 16781182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of the pressure applied during motion palpation and reliability for cervical spine rotation.
    Marcotte J; Normand MC; Black P
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2005 Oct; 28(8):591-6. PubMed ID: 16226627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interexaminer reliability of eight evaluative dimensions of lumbar segmental abnormality: Part II.
    Boline PD; Haas M; Meyer JJ; Kassak K; Nelson C; Keating JC
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1993; 16(6):363-74. PubMed ID: 8409784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Manipulative physiotherapists can reliably palpate nominated lumbar spinal levels.
    Downey BJ; Taylor NF; Niere KR
    Man Ther; 1999 Aug; 4(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 10513445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inter-examiner reliability of four static palpation tests used for assessing pelvic dysfunction.
    Holmgren U; Waling K
    Man Ther; 2008 Feb; 13(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 17210266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interexaminer reliability of palpation for cervical spine tenderness.
    Hubka MJ; Phelan SP
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1994; 17(9):591-5. PubMed ID: 7884328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intertester reliability and validity of motion assessments during lumbar spine accessory motion testing.
    Landel R; Kulig K; Fredericson M; Li B; Powers CM
    Phys Ther; 2008 Jan; 88(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 18029394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The quality of a manual method for the identification of the lumbar vertebrae].
    Spangsberg NL; Anker-Møller E; Justesen TM
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1990 Dec; 152(51):3870-1. PubMed ID: 2275036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inter- and intraexaminer reliability in identifying and classifying degenerative marrow (Modic) changes on lumbar spine magnetic resonance scans.
    Peterson CK; Gatterman B; Carter JC; Humphreys BK; Weibel A
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2007 Feb; 30(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 17320728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The reliability of selected motion- and pain provocation tests for the sacroiliac joint.
    Robinson HS; Brox JI; Robinson R; Bjelland E; Solem S; Telje T
    Man Ther; 2007 Feb; 12(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 16843031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An investigation into the validity of cervical spine motion palpation using subjects with congenital block vertebrae as a 'gold standard'.
    Humphreys BK; Delahaye M; Peterson CK
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2004 Jun; 5():19. PubMed ID: 15198806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity of palpation techniques for the identification of the spinous process L5.
    Merz O; Wolf U; Robert M; Gesing V; Rominger M
    Man Ther; 2013 Aug; 18(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 23414963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of single and composites of selected motion palpation and pain provocation tests for sacroiliac joint.
    Arab AM; Abdollahi I; Joghataei MT; Golafshani Z; Kazemnejad A
    Man Ther; 2009 Apr; 14(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 18373938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of the correct lumbar level using passive intersegmental motion testing.
    Chakraverty RC; Pynsent PB; Westwood A; Chakraverty JK
    Anaesthesia; 2007 Nov; 62(11):1121-5. PubMed ID: 17924892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forces applied to the cervical spine during posteroanterior mobilization.
    Snodgrass SJ; Rivett DA; Robertson VJ; Stojanovski E
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2009 Jan; 32(1):72-83. PubMed ID: 19121465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spinal landmark depth in relation to body mass index.
    Kawchuk GN; Prasad N; Parent E; Chapman S; Custodio M; Manzon M; Wiebe A; Dhillon S
    Man Ther; 2011 Aug; 16(4):384-7. PubMed ID: 21333583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Manual forces applied during cervical mobilization.
    Snodgrass SJ; Rivett DA; Robertson VJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2007 Jan; 30(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 17224351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of the correct cervical level by palpation of spinous processes.
    Shin S; Yoon DM; Yoon KB
    Anesth Analg; 2011 May; 112(5):1232-5. PubMed ID: 21346160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inter-rater Accuracy and Reliability of a Palpation Protocol of the C7 Spinous Process Comprising a Combination of 3 Traditional Palpation Techniques.
    Albuquerque PMNM; Da Silva EPC; Melo TMS; Montenegro EJN; de Oliveira DA; Guerino MR; De Siqueira GR
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2022; 45(3):227-234. PubMed ID: 35879125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.