These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18793924)

  • 21. Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Next instruments with and without glide path.
    Elnaghy AM; Elsaka SE
    J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2053-6. PubMed ID: 25301350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of the remaining dentin thickness in the root after hand and four rotary instrumentation techniques: an in vitro study.
    Rao MS; Shameem A; Nair R; Ghanta S; Thankachan RP; Issac JK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):712-7. PubMed ID: 24309353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative investigation of 2 rotary nickel-titanium instruments: protaper universal versus protaper.
    Unal GC; Maden M; Savgat A; Onur Orhan E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 19386519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
    Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of cervical preflaring on determination of apical file size in maxillary molars: SEM analysis.
    Vanni JR; Santos R; Limongi O; Guerisoli DM; Capelli A; Pécora JD
    Braz Dent J; 2005; 16(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 16429181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An in vitro comparison of the Excalibur handpiece and hand instrumentation in curved root canals.
    Cheung GS; Chan AW
    J Endod; 1996 Mar; 22(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 8618094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Residual dentin thickness in bifurcated maxillary first premolars after root canal and post space preparation with parallel-sided drills.
    Pilo R; Shapenco E; Lewinstein I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 18395536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Root canal preparation with Endo-Eze AET: changes in root canal shape assessed by micro-computed tomography.
    Paqué F; Barbakow F; Peters OA
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):456-64. PubMed ID: 15946266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cone-beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of Root Canal Preparation using Various Rotary Instruments: An in vitro Study.
    Ramanathan S; Solete P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Nov; 16(11):869-72. PubMed ID: 26718293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Residual dentin thickness in mandibular premolars prepared with gates glidden and ParaPost drills.
    Pilo R; Tamse A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jun; 83(6):617-23. PubMed ID: 10842127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in simulated root canals.
    Yang GB; Zhou XD; Zhang H; Wu HK
    Int Endod J; 2006 Oct; 39(10):791-9. PubMed ID: 16948665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Transportation of curved canals instrumented with manual and mechanical techniques.
    Leonardi LE; Atlas DM; Raiden G
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2005; 18(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 16302456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of three rotary systems and hand instrumentation technique for the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from the root canal.
    Gorduysus M; Nagas E; Torun OY; Gorduysus O
    Aust Endod J; 2011 Dec; 37(3):128-33. PubMed ID: 22117720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Morphometrical analysis of cleaning capacity of a hybrid instrumentation in mesial flattened root canals.
    Gonçalves LC; Junior EC; da Frota MF; Marques AA; Garcia Lda F
    Aust Endod J; 2011 Dec; 37(3):99-104. PubMed ID: 22117715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of ProTaper Universal, Endoflare, Revo-S, HyFlex coronal flaring instruments, and Gates Glidden drills on crack formation.
    Arslan H; Karataş E; Capar ID; Ozsu D; Doğanay E
    J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1681-3. PubMed ID: 25127932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of the root dentine cutting effectiveness of the HERO 642, HERO Apical and HERO Shaper rotary systems.
    Câmara AC; Aguiar CM; de Figueiredo JA
    Aust Endod J; 2008 Dec; 34(3):94-100. PubMed ID: 19032642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The challenge of C-shaped canal systems: a comparative study of the self-adjusting file and ProTaper.
    Solomonov M; Paqué F; Fan B; Eilat Y; Berman LH
    J Endod; 2012 Feb; 38(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 22244638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dentine removal in the coronal portion of root canals following two preparation techniques.
    Plotino G; Grande NM; Falanga A; Di Giuseppe IL; Lamorgese V; Somma F
    Int Endod J; 2007 Nov; 40(11):852-8. PubMed ID: 17697107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Root canal area increase promoted by the EndoSequence and ProTaper systems: comparison by computed tomography.
    Bernardes RA; Rocha EA; Duarte MA; Vivan RR; de Moraes IG; Bramante AS; de Azevedo JR
    J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1179-82. PubMed ID: 20630294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Residual dentin thickness in mandibular premolars prepared with hand and rotatory instruments.
    Pilo R; Corcino G; Tamse A
    J Endod; 1998 Jun; 24(6):401-4. PubMed ID: 9693582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.