These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

439 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18793930)

  • 1. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the effectiveness of the F-file versus ultrasonic activation of a K-file to remove smear layer.
    Chopra S; Murray PE; Namerow KN
    J Endod; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1243-5. PubMed ID: 18793930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
    Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
    J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.
    Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of F-File on removal of the smear layer: a scanning electron microscope study.
    Tunga U; Parlak E; Bodrumlu E; Aydemir H; Yeşilsoy C
    Aust Endod J; 2011 Aug; 37(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 21771185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new solution for the removal of the smear layer.
    Torabinejad M; Khademi AA; Babagoli J; Cho Y; Johnson WB; Bozhilov K; Kim J; Shabahang S
    J Endod; 2003 Mar; 29(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12669874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution and gel for smear layer removal.
    Dotto SR; Travassos RM; de Oliveira EP; Machado ME; Martins JL
    Aust Endod J; 2007 Aug; 33(2):62-5. PubMed ID: 17697246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 3: removal of debris and smear layer-A scanning electron microscope study.
    Metzger Z; Teperovich E; Cohen R; Zary R; Paqué F; Hülsmann M
    J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 20307746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Smear layer removal with passive ultrasonic irrigation and the NaviTip FX: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Goel S; Tewari S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):465-70. PubMed ID: 19576804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of the effectiveness of two canal lubricants in removing smear layer.
    Tam A; Yu DC
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2000 Nov; 21(11):967-72; quiz 974. PubMed ID: 11968147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of Glyde File Prep in combination with sodium hypochlorite as a root canal irrigant.
    Grandini S; Balleri P; Ferrari M
    J Endod; 2002 Apr; 28(4):300-3. PubMed ID: 12043868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Ballal NV; Kandian S; Mala K; Bhat KS; Acharya S
    J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1573-6. PubMed ID: 19840650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An in vitro study to compare the effectiveness of F-fle with ultrasonically activated K-fle to remove smear layer by using a scanning electron microscope.
    Shenvi S; Kumar BS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Sep; 14(5):825-9. PubMed ID: 24685782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the smear layer removal effectiveness of EDTA using two techniques: an SEM study.
    Tinaz AC; Karadag LS; Alaçam T; Mihçioglu T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Feb; 7(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 16491143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of F file compared to ultrasonic techniques using scanning electron microscopy.
    Pradeepkumar M; Venkateshbabu N; Emmanuel S; Kandaswamy D
    N Y State Dent J; 2012; 78(5):54-7. PubMed ID: 23082696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of radicular dentin erosion and smear layer removal capacity of Self-Adjusting File using different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite as an initial irrigant.
    Kaya S; Yiğit-Özer S; Adigüzel Ö
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):524-30. PubMed ID: 21664155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the efficacy of Smear Clear with and without a canal brush in smear layer and debris removal from instrumented root canal using WaveOne versus ProTaper: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Kamel WH; Kataia EM
    J Endod; 2014 Mar; 40(3):446-50. PubMed ID: 24565669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of EDTA with and without surfactants or ultrasonics on removal of smear layer.
    Lui JN; Kuah HG; Chen NN
    J Endod; 2007 Apr; 33(4):472-5. PubMed ID: 17368342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scanning electron microscopic preliminary study of the efficacy of SmearClear and EDTA for smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation in permanent teeth.
    da Silva LA; Sanguino AC; Rocha CT; Leonardo MR; Silva RA
    J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1541-4. PubMed ID: 19026891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of smear layer removal after use of a canal brush: an SEM study.
    Garip Y; Sazak H; Gunday M; Hatipoglu S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Aug; 110(2):e62-6. PubMed ID: 20573530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of EDTA with and without ultrasonics on removal of the smear layer.
    Kuah HG; Lui JN; Tseng PS; Chen NN
    J Endod; 2009 Mar; 35(3):393-6. PubMed ID: 19249602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.