These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18794677)

  • 1. Correlations between corneal biomechanical properties measured with the ocular response analyzer and ICare rebound tonometry.
    Jorge JM; González-Méijome JM; Queirós A; Fernandes P; Parafita MA
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):442-8. PubMed ID: 18794677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of corneal properties on rebound tonometry.
    Chui WS; Lam A; Chen D; Chiu R
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Jan; 115(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 17573114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of corneal biomechanical properties on rebound tonometer in patients with normal-tension glaucoma.
    Shin J; Lee JW; Kim EA; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 159(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 25308786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzer.
    Medeiros FA; Weinreb RN
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Oct; 15(5):364-70. PubMed ID: 16988597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical properties of the cornea measured by the Ocular Response Analyzer and their association with intraocular pressure and the central corneal curvature.
    Franco S; Lira M
    Clin Exp Optom; 2009 Nov; 92(6):469-75. PubMed ID: 19694758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of corneal geometrical and biomechanical properties on tonometry readings in keratoconic eyes.
    Bilgeç MD; Atalay E; Sözer Ö; Gürsoy H; Bilgin M; Yıldırım N
    Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 40(4):849-857. PubMed ID: 31792851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reproducibility and clinical relevance of the ocular response analyzer in nonoperated eyes: corneal biomechanical and tonometric implications.
    Moreno-Montañés J; Maldonado MJ; García N; Mendiluce L; García-Gómez PJ; Seguí-Gómez M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):968-74. PubMed ID: 18326720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of cornea on intraocular pressure measurement by ICARE PRO and ORA.
    Pluháček F; Unzeitigová A; Marešová K; Rybář J
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2019; 75(3):111-118. PubMed ID: 31779459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry.
    Pepose JS; Feigenbaum SK; Qazi MA; Sanderson JP; Roberts CJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jan; 143(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 17188041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in intraocular pressure values measured with noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer (ORA) and corvis scheimpflug technology tonometer (CST) in the early phase after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
    Shen Y; Su X; Liu X; Miao H; Fang X; Zhou X
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):205. PubMed ID: 27863469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Corneal biomechanical properties: precision and influence on tonometry.
    Ogbuehi KC; Osuagwu UL
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Jun; 37(3):124-31. PubMed ID: 24121009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technical note: a comparison of central and peripheral intraocular pressure using rebound tonometry.
    Queirós A; González-Méijome JM; Fernandes P; Jorge J; Montés-Micó R; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Sep; 27(5):506-11. PubMed ID: 17718891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of corneal edema on intraocular pressure measurements using goldmann applanation tonometry, Tono-Pen XL, iCare, and ORA: an in vitro model.
    Neuburger M; Maier P; Böhringer D; Reinhard T; F Jordan J
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Sep; 22(7):584-90. PubMed ID: 22366704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements.
    Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Fernandez-Vidal A; Mendez-Hernandez C; Garcia-Sanchez J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 47(10):4410-4. PubMed ID: 17003433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Corvis ST Tonometer for Measuring Postoperative IOP in LASIK Patients.
    Hong J; Yu Z; Jiang C; Zhou X; Liu Z; Sun X; Xu J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 25871871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanics in Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy and after posterior lamellar keratoplasty.
    Clemmensen K; Hjortdal J
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun; 92(4):350-4. PubMed ID: 23607620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Rebound Tonometry, Perkins Applanation Tonometry and Ocular Response Analyser in Mucopolysaccharidosis Patients.
    Wasielica-Poslednik J; Butsch C; Lampe C; Elflein H; Lamparter J; Weyer V; Pitz S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133586. PubMed ID: 26317991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [How does central cornea thickness influence intraocular pressure during applanation and contour tonometry?].
    Schwenteck T; Knappe M; Moros I
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Sep; 229(9):917-27. PubMed ID: 22972357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diurnal variation of corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure in normal subjects.
    Oncel B; Dinc UA; Gorgun E; Yalvaç BI
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):798-803. PubMed ID: 19787600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of aging on corneal biomechanical parameters using the ocular response analyzer.
    Kamiya K; Shimizu K; Ohmoto F
    J Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 25(10):888-93. PubMed ID: 19835329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.