146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18794748)
1. A biomechanical comparison of lateral and posterior approaches to sacroplasty.
Waites MD; Mears SC; Richards AM; Mathis JM; Belkoff SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(20):E735-8. PubMed ID: 18794748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical analysis of sacroplasty: does volume or location of cement matter?
Richards AM; Mears SC; Knight TA; Dinah AF; Belkoff SM
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2009 Feb; 30(2):315-7. PubMed ID: 18988683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of three methods of sacral fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone.
Mears SC; Sutter EG; Wall SJ; Rose DM; Belkoff SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(10):E392-5. PubMed ID: 20393387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cement Augmentation in Sacroiliac Screw Fixation Offers Modest Biomechanical Advantages in a Cadaver Model.
Osterhoff G; Dodd AE; Unno F; Wong A; Amiri S; Lefaivre KA; Guy P
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2522-2530. PubMed ID: 27334321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sacroplasty procedural extravasation with high viscosity bone cement: comparing the intraoperative long-axis versus short-axis techniques in osteoporotic cadavers.
Miller JW; Diani A; Docsa S; Ashton K; Sciamanna M
J Neurointerv Surg; 2017 Sep; 9(9):899-904. PubMed ID: 27455874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sacroplasty in a cadaveric trial: comparison of CT and fluoroscopic guidance with and without balloon assistance.
Grossterlinden L; Begemann PG; Lehmann W; Nuechtern J; Schumacher U; Nagel HD; Linhart W; Adam G; Rueger JM; Briem D
Eur Spine J; 2009 Aug; 18(8):1226-33. PubMed ID: 19387703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer assisted percutaneous placement of augmented iliosacral screws: a reasonable alternative to sacroplasty.
Tjardes T; Paffrath T; Baethis H; Shafizadeh S; Steinhausen E; Steinbuechel T; Rixen D; Bouillon B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jun; 33(13):1497-500. PubMed ID: 18520946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Percutaneous sacroplasty for osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fractures: a prospective, multicenter, observational pilot study.
Frey ME; Depalma MJ; Cifu DX; Bhagia SM; Carne W; Daitch JS
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):367-73. PubMed ID: 17981097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CT-guided sacroplasty for the treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures.
Heron J; Connell DA; James SL
Clin Radiol; 2007 Nov; 62(11):1094-100; discussion 1101-3. PubMed ID: 17920869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A biomechanical investigation of vertebroplasty in osteoporotic compression fractures and in prophylactic vertebral reinforcement.
Furtado N; Oakland RJ; Wilcox RK; Hall RM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(17):E480-7. PubMed ID: 17762281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiofrequency sacroplasty (RFS) for the treatment of osteoporotic insufficiency fractures.
Andresen R; Lüdtke CW; Radmer S; Kamusella P; Schober HC
Eur Spine J; 2015 Apr; 24(4):759-63. PubMed ID: 25358765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multicenter study to assess the efficacy and safety of sacroplasty in patients with osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fractures or pathologic sacral lesions.
Kortman K; Ortiz O; Miller T; Brook A; Tutton S; Mathis J; Georgy B
J Neurointerv Surg; 2013 Sep; 5(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 22684691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical analysis of stiffness and fracture displacement after using PMMA-augmented sacroiliac screw fixation for sacrum fractures.
Höch A; Schimpf R; Hammer N; Schleifenbaum S; Werner M; Josten C; Böhme J
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2017 Aug; 62(4):421-428. PubMed ID: 28306517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. First experience using navigation-guided radiofrequency kyphoplasty for sacroplasty in sacral insufficiency fractures.
Klingler JH; Kluge P; Sircar R; Kogias E; Scholz C; Krüger MT; Scheiwe C; Hubbe U
Rofo; 2013 Aug; 185(8):733-40. PubMed ID: 23801449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vertebroplasty of the first sacral vertebra.
Betts A
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(3):651-7. PubMed ID: 19461832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanical analysis of percutaneous sacroplasty using CT image based finite element models.
Anderson DE; Cotton JR
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Apr; 29(3):316-25. PubMed ID: 16730213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigating sacroplasty: technical considerations and finite element analysis of polymethylmethacrylate infusion into cadaveric sacrum.
Whitlow CT; Yazdani SK; Reedy ML; Kaminsky SE; Berry JL; Morris PP
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007; 28(6):1036-41. PubMed ID: 17569952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computerized tomography guided sacroplasty: a practical treatment for sacral insufficiency fracture: case report.
Brook AL; Mirsky DM; Bello JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Aug; 30(15):E450-4. PubMed ID: 16094265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Osteoporotic fracture of the sacrum: sacroplasty and physical medecine.
Thomas EN; Cyteval C; Herisson C; Leonard L; Blotman F
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2009 Jun; 52(5):427-35. PubMed ID: 19515622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sacroplasty.
Ortiz AO; Brook AL
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol; 2009 Mar; 12(1):51-63. PubMed ID: 19769907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
