BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18795084)

  • 1. The value of dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI in mammographically detected BI-RADS 5 microcalcifications.
    Houserkova D; Prasad SN; Svach I; Kucerova L; Duskova M; Bucil J; Sisola I; Zlamalova N; Svebisova H
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2008 Jun; 152(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 18795084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
    Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
    Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
    Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
    Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study.
    Fajardo LL; Pisano ED; Caudry DJ; Gatsonis CA; Berg WA; Connolly J; Schnitt S; Page DL; McNeil BJ;
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Mar; 11(3):293-308. PubMed ID: 15035520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictive values of BI-RADS(®) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
    Badan GM; Piato S; Roveda D; de Faria Castro Fleury E
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 85(10):1701-1707. PubMed ID: 27666605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
    Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 3-T breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography.
    Stehouwer BL; Merckel LG; Verkooijen HM; Peters NH; Mann RM; Duvivier KM; Mali WP; Peeters PH; Veldhuis WB; van den Bosch MA
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Mar; 24(3):603-9. PubMed ID: 24078055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.
    Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C; Panizza P; Del Frate C; Soldano F; Isola M; Sardanelli F; Giuseppetti GM; Simonetti G; Lattanzio V; Del Maschio A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1723-32. PubMed ID: 16714666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rates of reexcision for breast cancer after magnetic resonance imaging-guided bracket wire localization.
    Wallace AM; Daniel BL; Jeffrey SS; Birdwell RL; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Schraedley-Desmond P; Ikeda DM
    J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Apr; 200(4):527-37. PubMed ID: 15804466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Stereotactic vacuum core biopsy of clustered microcalcifications classified as B1-RADS 3].
    Obenauer S; Fischer U; Baum F; Dammert S; Füzesi L; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2001 Aug; 173(8):696-701. PubMed ID: 11570238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The value of MRI contrast enhancement in biopsy decision of suspicious mammographic microcalcifications: a prospective multicenter study.
    Taskin F; Kalayci CB; Tuncbilek N; Soydemir E; Kurt N; Kaya H; Aribal E
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Mar; 31(3):1718-1726. PubMed ID: 32939619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictors of invasive breast cancer in mammographically detected microcalcification in patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia, atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ and recommendations for a selective approach to sentinel lymph node biopsy.
    Catteau X; Simon P; Noël JC
    Pathol Res Pract; 2012 Apr; 208(4):217-20. PubMed ID: 22445178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for patients with BI-RADS 3-4 microcalcifications.
    Jiang Y; Lou J; Wang S; Zhao Y; Wang C; Wang D
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99669. PubMed ID: 24927476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic usefulness of segmental and linear enhancement in dynamic breast MRI.
    Morakkabati-Spitz N; Leutner C; Schild H; Traeber F; Kuhl C
    Eur Radiol; 2005 Sep; 15(9):2010-7. PubMed ID: 15841382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in probably benign (BI-RADS category 3) microcalcifications of the breast.
    Linda A; Zuiani C; Londero V; Di Gaetano E; Dal Col A; Girometti R; Bazzocchi M
    Radiol Med; 2014 Jun; 119(6):393-9. PubMed ID: 24297595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the stereotactic 8G vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in the histologic evaluation of suspicious mammography findings (BI-RADS IV).
    Diebold T; Hahn T; Solbach C; Rody A; Balzer JO; Hansmann ML; Marx A; Viana F; Peters J; Jacobi V; Kaufmann M; Vogl TJ
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Jul; 40(7):465-71. PubMed ID: 15973139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammotome core biopsy for mammary microcalcification: analysis of 160 biopsies from 142 women with surgical and radiologic followup.
    Cangiarella J; Waisman J; Symmans WF; Gross J; Cohen JM; Wu H; Axelrod D
    Cancer; 2001 Jan; 91(1):173-7. PubMed ID: 11148574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is the upgrade rate of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by core needle biopsy of calcifications different for digital and film-screen mammography?
    McLaughlin CT; Neal CH; Helvie MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):917-22. PubMed ID: 25247961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [MRI outstands mammogram in sensitivity of breast ductal carcinoma in situ:an analysis of 122 cases].
    Yu QX; Chen XS; Wu JY; Han BS; He JR; Zhu L; Chen WG; Li YF; Tan L; Chai WM; Wang DB; Fei XC; Yuan F; Jin XL; Shen KW; Li HW
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 51(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 23578423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.