BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18795353)

  • 1. Modeling distraction osteogenesis: analysis of the distraction rate.
    Reina-Romo E; Gómez-Benito MJ; García-Aznar JM; Domínguez J; Doblaré M
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2009 Aug; 8(4):323-35. PubMed ID: 18795353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of the fixator stiffness on the young regenerate bone after bone transport: computational approach.
    Reina-Romo E; Gómez-Benito MJ; Domínguez J; Niemeyer F; Wehner T; Simon U; Claes LE
    J Biomech; 2011 Mar; 44(5):917-23. PubMed ID: 21168137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experimental studies on the effect of osteotomy technique on the bone regeneration in distraction osteogenesis.
    Krawczyk A; Kuropka P; Kuryszko J; Wall A; Dragan S; Kulej M
    Bone; 2007 Mar; 40(3):781-91. PubMed ID: 17140872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bone regeneration and fracture healing. Experience with distraction osteogenesis model.
    Richards M; Goulet JA; Weiss JA; Waanders NA; Schaffler MB; Goldstein SA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355 Suppl):S191-204. PubMed ID: 9917639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis: mechano-regulation by shear strain and fluid velocity.
    Isaksson H; Comas O; van Donkelaar CC; Mediavilla J; Wilson W; Huiskes R; Ito K
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(9):2002-11. PubMed ID: 17112532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cellular and molecular characterization of a murine non-union model.
    Choi P; Ogilvie C; Thompson Z; Miclau T; Helms JA
    J Orthop Res; 2004 Sep; 22(5):1100-7. PubMed ID: 15304285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Growth mixture model of distraction osteogenesis: effect of pre-traction stresses.
    Reina-Romo E; Gómez-Benito MJ; García-Aznar JM; Domínguez J; Doblaré M
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2010 Feb; 9(1):103-15. PubMed ID: 19582492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Possible problems of moulding the regenerate in mandibular distraction osteogenesis -- experimental aspects in a canine model.
    Kunz C; Adolphs N; Buescher P; Hammer B; Rahn B
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 33(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 16253512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical and clinical implications of distraction osteogenesis in craniofacial surgery.
    Meyer U; Kleinheinz J; Joos U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2004 Jun; 32(3):140-9. PubMed ID: 15113571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why high frequency of distraction improved the bone formation in distraction osteogenesis?
    Ji B; Jiang G; Fu J; Long J; Wang H
    Med Hypotheses; 2010 May; 74(5):871-3. PubMed ID: 20018456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increased lengthening rate decreases expression of fibroblast growth factor 2, platelet-derived growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, and CD31 in a rat model of distraction osteogenesis.
    Schiller JR; Moore DC; Ehrlich MG
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2007 Dec; 27(8):961-8. PubMed ID: 18209624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Histomorphometric comparison between continuous and discontinuous distraction osteogenesis.
    Djasim UM; Mathot BJ; Wolvius EB; van Neck JW; van der Wal KG
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 37(7):398-404. PubMed ID: 19457679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Osteogenic alveolar distraction: a review of the literature.
    Cano J; Campo J; Moreno LA; Bascones A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jan; 101(1):11-28. PubMed ID: 16360604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Autologous tissue engineering by means of distraction osteogenesis: Biomechanical considerations].
    Schouman T; Raoul G; Dubois G
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2011 Sep; 112(4):222-8. PubMed ID: 21794888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Bone fracture and the healing mechanisms. The mechanical stress for fracture healing in view of distraction osteogenesis].
    Yukata K; Takahashi M; Yasui N
    Clin Calcium; 2009 May; 19(5):641-6. PubMed ID: 19398830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of distraction forces and frequency of distraction on bony regeneration.
    Kessler P; Neukam FW; Wiltfang J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Oct; 43(5):392-8. PubMed ID: 16026911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of oil-based calcium hydroxide (Osteoinductal) on distraction osteogenesis in rabbit mandible.
    Polat HB; Yeler H; Gumus C; Bulut HE; Kucuk D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):e30-6. PubMed ID: 19464640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanobiology of mandibular distraction osteogenesis: experimental analyses with a rat model.
    Loboa EG; Fang TD; Warren SM; Lindsey DP; Fong KD; Longaker MT; Carter DR
    Bone; 2004 Feb; 34(2):336-43. PubMed ID: 14962812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Locally applied nerve growth factor enhances bone consolidation in a rabbit model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
    Wang L; Zhou S; Liu B; Lei D; Zhao Y; Lu C; Tan A
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Dec; 24(12):2238-45. PubMed ID: 17001706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A simple mechanism for measuring and adjusting distraction forces during maxillary advancement.
    Suzuki EY; Suzuki B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2245-53. PubMed ID: 19761920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.