300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18795745)
1. Improvements to the decision process.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2008 Aug; 28(8):5-7. PubMed ID: 18795745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Approved: 2010 updates to accreditation and certification decision rules.
Joint Commission
Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 Aug; 29(8):7-17. PubMed ID: 19731484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Approved: Accreditation and certification decision rules for 2011.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2010 Nov; 30(11):1, 10-7. PubMed ID: 21128540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Revisions to the certification appeal process.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 May; 25(5):10. PubMed ID: 16032807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Approved: Refined decision categories for accreditation and certification.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2010 Nov; 30(11):7, 18. PubMed ID: 21128542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Change in the process for organizations in which their survey reports meet a rule for conditional accreditation or preliminary denial of accreditation decision.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Sep; 24(9):7. PubMed ID: 15484653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The 2009 accreditation decision process.
Joint Commission
Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 Jul; 29(7):1, 4-5. PubMed ID: 19658280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Correction to "The New Joint Commission Accreditation Process" chapter for hospitals.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 May; 25(5):7. PubMed ID: 16032806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Approved: 2012 accreditation and certification decision rules.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2011 Sep; 31(9):7-14. PubMed ID: 22315803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. ERRATA: all 2009 accreditation and certification manuals.
Joint Commission
Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 May; 29(5):9-12. PubMed ID: 19845209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Corrections to "Joint Commission Accreditation Process" chapter in 2006 Comprehensive Manuals.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Nov; 25(11):5. PubMed ID: 16700334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Revised accreditation decision categories and definitions announced.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2000; 20(3):11. PubMed ID: 11066744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Approved: 2007 certification decision rules.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 Oct; 26(10):5-8. PubMed ID: 17139925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Gaining JCAHO pharmacy accreditation.
Rogers S
Provider; 1997 Nov; 23(11):60-1. PubMed ID: 10173671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Correction to accreditation decision in Early Survey Policy Option 2.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jun; 24(6):3-4. PubMed ID: 15282886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Interim weighted decision rules not applied under certain circumstances.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Mar; 24(3):8. PubMed ID: 15035233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Refinements to the system accreditation option.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 May; 26(5):4-5. PubMed ID: 16739383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. 2004 aggregation and decision rules approved for all programs.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2003 Aug; 23(8):1, 3-6. PubMed ID: 12920779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The postsurvey process.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 Apr; 26(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 16776421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Potential outcomes of type Is explained. Conditional accreditation twice in one accreditation cycle triggers PDA rule.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2002 Jun; 22(6):2-3. PubMed ID: 12094778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
